This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a related Letter to the Editor Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints, Permissions and Rights Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Duvillard, L. Articles by Vergès, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Duvillard, L. Articles by Vergès, B. Related Collections Lipid Diabetes and Insulin

Comparison of Apolipoprotein B100 Metabolism between Continuous Subcutaneous and Intraperitoneal Insulin Therapy in Type 1 Diabetes

Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité 498 (L.D., E.F., J.-M.P., P.G., B.V.), and Department of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases (S.B.-R., M.-L.L.-M., A.B.-P., J.-M.P., J.-M.B., B.V.), Hôpital du Bocage, 21079 Dijon, France

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Laurence Duvillard, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité 498, Hôpital du Bocage, BP 77908, 21079 Dijon Cedex, France. E-mail: laurence.duvillard{at}chu-dijon.fr.

Objective: In type 1 diabetic patients, the replacement of sc insulin infusion with ip insulin infusion restores the normal physiological gradient between the portal vein and the peripheral circulation, which is likely to modify lipoprotein metabolism.

Design: To check this hypothesis, we performed two apolipoprotein (apo) B100 kinetic studies in seven type 1 diabetic patients, first under sc insulin infusion and then 3 months after the beginning of ip insulin infusion.

Results: Glycemic control was similar under sc insulin infusion and ip insulin infusion, as assessed by glycated hemoglobin A_1c and the capillary glycemic curve determined during the kinetic study. Very low-density and intermediate-density lipoprotein apoB100 pool size, production rate, and fractional catabolic rate (FCR) were similar under sc insulin infusion and ip insulin infusion. The low-density lipoprotein apoB100 FCR tended to decrease under ip insulin (0.45 ± 0.06 vs. 0.55 ± 0.11 pool/d), but the difference did not reach statistical significance (95% confidence interval for the difference, –0.33, 0.11). The low-density lipoprotein apoB100 pool size and production rate remained unchanged under ip insulin infusion compared with sc insulin infusion.

Conclusion: In type 1 diabetic patients, the replacement of sc insulin infusion with ip insulin infusion does not induce profound modifications of apoB100-containing lipoprotein production and FCRs.