help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, doi:10.1210/jc.2004-0941
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
90/1/386    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stachenfeld, N. S.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, H. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stachenfeld, N. S.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, H. S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*ESTRADIOL
*PROGESTERONE
*SODIUM
Related Collections
Right arrow Female Endocrinology
Right arrow Neuroendocrinology and Pituitary
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 90, No. 1 386-394
Copyright © 2005 by The Endocrine Society

Responses to a Saline Load in Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist-Pretreated Premenopausal Women Receiving Progesterone or Estradiol-Progesterone Therapy

Nina S. Stachenfeld, David L. Keefe and Hugh S. Taylor

John B. Pierce Laboratory and Departments of Epidemiology and Public Health, and Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine and Women and Infants Hospital, Brown University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06519

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Nina S. Stachenfeld, John B. Pierce Laboratory, 290 Congress Avenue, New Haven, Connecticut 06519. E-mail: nstach{at}jbpierce.org.

The effects of estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4) on fluid and sodium regulation may have important clinical implications with respect to cardiovascular and renal disease as well as reproductive syndromes such as preeclampsia and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. We tested the hypothesis that sodium excretion is reduced in response to a sodium load during combined P4-E2 treatment, but P4 administration alone has little effect on sodium regulation. Fifteen women (22 ± 2 yr) used a GnRH antagonist to suppress endogenous E2 and P4 for 9 d; for d 4–9, eight subjects used P4 (200 mg/d), and seven subjects used P4 with E2 (two E2 patches, 0.1 mg/d each). On d 3 and 9, isotonic saline (0.9% NaCl) was infused [120 min at 0.1 ml/kg body weight (BW)·min], followed by 120 min of rest. Compared with GnRH antagonist alone, P[P4] increased from 1.6 ± 0.8 to 9.4 ± 2.3 ng/ml (5.1 ± 2.5 to 29.9 ± 7.3 nmol/liter, P < 0.05) in the P4 treated group, with no change in P[E2]. In the P4-E2 treated group P[P4] increased from 1.6 ± 0.5 to 6.7 ± 0.6 ng/ml (5.1 ± 1.6 to 21.3 ± 1.6 nmol/liter, P < 0.05 and P[E2] increased from 17.9 ± 6.3 to 200 ± 41 pg/ml (65.7 ± 23 to 734.6 ± 150.0 pmol/liter, P < 0.05). Before isotonic saline infusion, renal sodium and water excretion were similar under all conditions, but during isotonic saline infusion, cumulative sodium excretion was lower in the P4-E2 treated women (34.1 ± 5.1 mEq) compared with GnRH antagonist (50.2 ± 11.4 mEq). Sodium excretion was unaffected by P4 treatment (48.0 ± 8.2 and 41.2 ± 5.1 mEq, for GnRH antagonist and P4). Compared with GnRH antagonist alone, P4-E2 treatment increased distal sodium reabsorption and transiently decreased proximal sodium reabsorption, whereas P4 treatment did not alter either distal or proximal sodium reabsorption. Before isotonic saline infusion, the plasma aldosterone (Ald) concentration was greater during P4 treatment (153 ± 25 pg/ml; 3883 ± 1102 pmol/liter) and P4-E2 treatment (242 ± 47 pg/ml; 6373 ± 1390 pmol/liter) than during their respective GnRH antagonist alone treatments [96 ± 13 and 148 ± 47 pg/ml (2598 ± 475 and 3284 ± 973 pmol/liter) for P4 and combined P4-E2, respectively]. Compared with GnRH antagonist alone treatments, preisotonic saline infusion plasma renin activity was greater only with P4-E2 treatment, whereas the plasma atrial natriuretic peptide concentration was lower only with P4 treatment. Isotonic saline infusion suppressed plasma Ald under all conditions, but decreased plasma renin activity only with P4-E2 treatment (average decrease, 1.3 ± 0.5 ng/ml angiotensin I·h; P < 0.05). In summary, we found that P4-E2 treatment decreased sodium excretion via either renin-angiotensin-Ald system stimulation or direct effects on kidney tubules. P4 treatment at these plasma concentrations had no independent effect on the renal response to acute sodium loading. These data suggest that E2 is the more powerful reproductive hormone involved in sodium retention relative to P4, and that estrogen-induced up-regulation of P4 receptors is required for the effects of P4 on sodium regulation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
E. D. Szmuilowicz, G. K. Adler, J. S. Williams, D. E. Green, T. M. Yao, P. N. Hopkins, and E. W. Seely
Relationship between Aldosterone and Progesterone in the Human Menstrual Cycle
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2006; 91(10): 3981 - 3987.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
N. S. Stachenfeld and H. S. Taylor
Progesterone increases plasma volume independent of estradiol
J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2005; 98(6): 1991 - 1997.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2005 by The Endocrine Society