help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beckers, N. G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Fauser, B. C. J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beckers, N. G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Fauser, B. C. J. M.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 88, No. 9 4186-4192
Copyright © 2003 by The Endocrine Society

Nonsupplemented Luteal Phase Characteristics after the Administration of Recombinant Human Chorionic Gonadotropin, Recombinant Luteinizing Hormone, or Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Agonist to Induce Final Oocyte Maturation in in Vitro Fertilization Patients after Ovarian Stimulation with Recombinant Follicle-Stimulating Hormone and GnRH Antagonist Cotreatment

Nicole G. M. Beckers, Nicholas S. Macklon, Marinus J. Eijkemans, Michael Ludwig, Ricardo E. Felberbaum, Klaus Diedrich, Shelly Bustion, Ernest Loumaye and Bart C. J. M. Fauser

Division of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (N.G.M.B., N.S.M., B.C.J.M.F.) and Department of Public Health (M.J.E.), Erasmus Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics (M.L., R.E.F., K.D.), University Clinic Hospital, 23538 Luebeck, Germany; and Serono International (S.B., E.L.), CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Prof. Bart C. J. M. Fauser, M.D., Ph.D., Division of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: b.fauser{at}erasmusmc.nl.

Replacing GnRH agonist cotreatment for the prevention of a premature rise in LH during ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) by the late follicular phase administration of GnRH antagonist may render supplementation of the luteal phase redundant, because of the known rapid recovery of pituitary function after antagonist cessation.

This randomized two-center study was performed to compare nonsupplemented luteal phase characteristics after three different strategies for inducing final oocyte maturation. Forty patients underwent ovarian stimulation using recombinant (r-)FSH (150 IU/d, fixed) combined with a GnRH antagonist (antide; 1 mg/d) during the late follicular phase. When at least one follicle above 18 mm was observed, patients were randomized to induce oocyte maturation by a single injection of either r-human (h)CG (250 µg) (n = 11), r-LH (1 mg) (n = 13), or GnRH agonist (triptorelin; 0.2 mg) (n = 15). Retrieved oocytes were fertilized by either IVF or intracytoplasmatic sperm injection, depending on sperm quality. Embryo transfer was performed 3–4 d after oocyte retrieval. No luteal support was provided. Serum concentrations of FSH, LH, estradiol (E2), progesterone (P), and hCG were assessed at fixed intervals during the follicular and luteal phase.

The median duration of the luteal phase was 13, 10, and 9 d for the r-hCG, the r-LH, and the GnRH agonist group, respectively (P = 0.005). The median area under the curve per day (from 4 d post randomization until the onset of menses) for LH was 0.50, 2.34, and 1.07 for the r-hCG, the r-LH, and the GnRH agonist group, respectively (P = 0.001). The median area under the curve per day for P was 269 vs. 41 and 16 for the r-hCG, the r-LH, and the GnRH agonist group, respectively (P < 0.001). Low pregnancy rates (overall, 7.5%; range, 0–18% per started cycle) were observed in all groups.

In conclusion, the nonsupplemented luteal phase was insufficient in all three groups. In the patients receiving r-hCG, the luteal phase was less disturbed, compared with both other groups, presumably because of prolonged clearance of hCG from the circulation and the resulting extended support of the corpus luteum. Despite high P and E2 concentrations during the early luteal phase in all three groups, luteolysis started prematurely, presumably because of excessive negative steroid feedback resulting in suppressed pituitary LH release. Hence, support of corpus luteum function remains mandatory after ovarian stimulation for IVF with GnRH antagonist cotreatment.

This investigator-driven study was supported by a research grant from Serono International SA, and by the ‘Stichting Voortplantingsgeneeskunde’ Rotterdam.

Abbreviations: AUC, Area under the curve; E2, estradiol; h, human; ICSI, intracytoplasmatic sperm injection; IVF, in vitro fertilization; M II, metaphase II; P, progesterone; r-, recombinant; TVS, transvaginal ultrasound.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
N. S. Macklon, M. H. van der Gaast, A. Hamilton, B. C. J. M. Fauser, and L. C. Giudice
The Impact of Ovarian Stimulation With Recombinant FSH in Combination With GnRH Antagonist on the Endometrial Transcriptome in the Window of Implantation
Reproductive Sciences, April 1, 2008; 15(4): 357 - 365.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
H.M. Fatemi, B. Popovic-Todorovic, E. Papanikolaou, P. Donoso, and P. Devroey
An update of luteal phase support in stimulated IVF cycles
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2007; 13(6): 581 - 590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in 2006: Evidence and Evolution
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2007; 13(6): 515 - 526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Vani, S. E. McDonald, A. R.W. Williams, J. I. Mason, K. J. Thong, and H. O.D. Critchley
Mid-luteal endometrial intracrinology following controlled ovarian hyperstimulation involving use of a gonadotrophin releasing hormone antagonist
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2007; 22(11): 2981 - 2991.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
K. Diedrich, B.C.J.M. Fauser, P. Devroey, G. Griesinger, and on behalf of the Evian Annual Reproduction (EVAR)
The role of the endometrium and embryo in human implantation
Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2007; 13(4): 365 - 377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
N. F. Vlahos, C. W. Lipari, B. Bankowski, T.-H. Lai, J. A. King, I.-M. Shih, K. Fragakis, and Y. Zhao
Effect of Luteal-Phase Support on Endometrial L-Selectin Ligand Expression after Recombinant Follicle-Stimulating Hormone and Ganirelix Acetate for in Vitro Fertilization
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2006; 91(10): 4043 - 4049.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H.-C. Ruan, X.-M. Zhu, Q. Luo, A.-X. Liu, Y.-L. Qian, C.-Y. Zhou, F. Jin, H.-F. Huang, and J.-Z. Sheng
Ovarian stimulation with GnRH agonist, but not GnRH antagonist, partially restores the expression of endometrial integrin beta3 and leukaemia-inhibitory factor and improves uterine receptivity in mice
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2521 - 2529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H.M. Fatemi, E.M. Kolibianakis, M. Camus, H. Tournaye, P. Donoso, E. Papanikolaou, and P. Devroey
Addition of estradiol to progesterone for luteal supplementation in patients stimulated with GnRH antagonist/rFSH for IVF: a randomized controlled trial
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2628 - 2632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Tesarik, A. Hazout, R. Mendoza-Tesarik, N. Mendoza, and C. Mendoza
Beneficial effect of luteal-phase GnRH agonist administration on embryo implantation after ICSI in both GnRH agonist- and antagonist-treated ovarian stimulation cycles
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2572 - 2579.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
I. E. Messinis
Ovarian feedback, mechanism of action and possible clinical implications
Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2006; 12(5): 557 - 571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
N. G M Beckers, P. Platteau, M. J Eijkemans, N. S Macklon, F. H de Jong, P. Devroey, and B. C J M Fauser
The early luteal phase administration of estrogen and progesterone does not induce premature luteolysis in normo-ovulatory women.
Eur. J. Endocrinol., August 1, 2006; 155(2): 355 - 363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Y. Andersen, P. Humaidan, H. B. Ejdrup, L. Bungum, M.L. Grondahl, and L.G. Westergaard
Hormonal characteristics of follicular fluid from women receiving either GnRH agonist or hCG for ovulation induction
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2006; 21(8): 2126 - 2130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
B.C. Tarlatzis, B.C. Fauser, E.M. Kolibianakis, K. Diedrich, P. Devroey, and , On Behalf of the Brussels GnRH Antagonist Consen
GnRH antagonists in ovarian stimulation for IVF
Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2006; 12(4): 333 - 340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Pirard, J. Donnez, and E. Loumaye
GnRH agonist as luteal phase support in assisted reproduction technique cycles: results of a pilot study
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2006; 21(7): 1894 - 1900.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R. Babayof, E. J. Margalioth, M. Huleihel, A. Amash, E. Zylber-Haran, M. Gal, B. Brooks, T. Mimoni, and T. Eldar-Geva
Serum inhibin A, VEGF and TNF{alpha} levels after triggering oocyte maturation with GnRH agonist compared with HCG in women with polycystic ovaries undergoing IVF treatment: a prospective randomized trial
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2006; 21(5): 1260 - 1265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
N. S. Macklon, R. L. Stouffer, L. C. Giudice, and B. C. J. M. Fauser
The Science behind 25 Years of Ovarian Stimulation for in Vitro Fertilization
Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2006; 27(2): 170 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
G. Griesinger, K. Diedrich, P. Devroey, and E.M. Kolibianakis
GnRH agonist for triggering final oocyte maturation in the GnRH antagonist ovarian hyperstimulation protocol: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2006; 12(2): 159 - 168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E.M. Kolibianakis, A. Schultze-Mosgau, A. Schroer, A. van Steirteghem, P. Devroey, K. Diedrich, and G. Griesinger
A lower ongoing pregnancy rate can be expected when GnRH agonist is used for triggering final oocyte maturation instead of HCG in patients undergoing IVF with GnRH antagonists
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2005; 20(10): 2887 - 2892.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Pirard, J. Donnez, and E. Loumaye
GnRH agonist as novel luteal support: results of a randomized, parallel group, feasibility study using intranasal administration of buserelin
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2005; 20(7): 1798 - 1804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Humaidan, H. Ejdrup Bredkjaer, L. Bungum, M. Bungum, M.L. Grondahl, L. Westergaard, and C. Yding Andersen
GnRH agonist (buserelin) or hCG for ovulation induction in GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI cycles: a prospective randomized study
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2005; 20(5): 1213 - 1220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. Ioannidis, G. Sacks, N. Reddy, L. Seyani, R. Margara, S. Lavery, and G. Trew
Day 14 maternal serum progesterone levels predict pregnancy outcome in IVF/ICSI treatment cycles: a prospective study
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2005; 20(3): 741 - 746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Mirkin, G. Nikas, J.-G. Hsiu, J. Diaz, and S. Oehninger
Gene Expression Profiles and Structural/Functional Features of the Peri-Implantation Endometrium in Natural and Gonadotropin-Stimulated Cycles
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2004; 89(11): 5742 - 5752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2003 by The Endocrine Society