| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Departments of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women’s Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, New York 10461
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Nanette Santoro, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women’s Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Mazer 325, Bronx, New York 10461. E-mail: glicktoro{at}aol.com.
The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that older reproductive aged women ovulate at a smaller follicle diameter and are more likely to produce multiple follicles during their menstrual cycle compared with midreproductive aged women. We performed a comparative study of 16 midreproductive aged women (MRA; 22–34 yr old) and 34 older reproductive aged women (ORA; 
45 yr old). Women underwent serial transvaginal ultrasounds to follow follicular growth over 1 menstrual cycle. A subset of women (nine MRA and 19 ORA) had daily blood sampling. Scans were initiated within 1 wk of menses and were performed at least 3 times/wk until evidence of follicular collapse was observed. If there was no evidence of follicle growth beyond 10 mm by 20 d, observations (ultrasounds and blood sampling) were ended. Follicle growth was organized backward from maximum presumed preovulatory diameter. Hormones were standardized to d 0, the day when progesterone levels exceeded 2 ng/ml. Group comparisons were performed using ANOVA with Mann-Whitney post hoc testing and Kruskal-Wallis testing for integrated hormones. The main outcome measures were peak follicle diameter, follicle growth patterns, and circulating LH, FSH estradiol, progesterone, inhibin A, and inhibin B. Six of 34 ORA women never underwent serial ultrasound. An additional 5 ORA women failed to ovulate on the basis of daily blood sampling or had no evidence of follicle growth beyond 10 mm by 20 d. Two of 16 MRA women were excluded: 1 due to severely decreased ovarian reserve at screening and 1 due to failure of follicle growth by cycle d 20. Small follicle counts in the follicular phase of the cycle (beginning of cycle through d -4) were greater in MRA women compared with ORA women (4.7 ± 0.56 vs. 3.4 ± 0.34; P = 0.042). Among presumed ovulatory cycles, ORA women demonstrated considerably more variable follicle growth patterns, with larger initial follicle size, but a trend toward smaller peak follicle diameters (15.22 ± 0.95 vs. 17.85 ± 0.71 mm; P = 0.07). ORA women were twice as likely to have multiple follicles as younger women (odds ratio, 2.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.93–4.6), but this observed difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.083). Comparisons of LH, FSH, estradiol, and progesterone between ORA (n = 14) and MRA (n = 8) women indicated the expected increase in FSH secretion, most evident in the early follicular phase of the cycle. Estradiol and progesterone concentrations did not differ between these groups. Inhibin B was decreased in ORA women compared with MRA women (P = 0.030). Despite normal-appearing patterns of follicle growth, grossly abnormal hormonal patterns were observed in some of the ORA women’s cycles. Other cycles demonstrated a failure of folliculogenesis. These patterns are not observed in MRA women’s cycles. ORA women ovulated at a smaller mean follicle diameter and had larger initial follicle diameters than younger women. The overall follicle growth curves of the older women tended to be flatter than those of the younger women. Taken together, the data suggest that follicle growth begins earlier in the cycle of perimenopausal women, but growth progresses more slowly. Ovulation may occur at an earlier stage of growth in association with reproductive aging.
This work was supported by Grants AG-12222 and HD-12585 (to N.S.) and RR-95261064 (to the General Clinical Research Center).
Abbreviations: AUC, Area under the curve; MRA, midreproductive aged; ORA, older reproductive aged.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  K. A. O'Connor, R. J. Ferrell, E. Brindle, J. Shofer, D. J. Holman, R. C. Miller, D. E. Schechter, B. Singer, and M. Weinstein Total and Unopposed Estrogen Exposure across Stages of the Transition to Menopause Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2009; 18(3): 828 - 836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Santoro, S. L. Crawford, W. L. Lasley, J. L. Luborsky, K. A. Matthews, D. McConnell, J. F. Randolph Jr., E. B. Gold, G. A. Greendale, S. G. Korenman, et al. Factors Related to Declining Luteal Function in Women during the Menopausal Transition J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2008; 93(5): 1711 - 1721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. L. Niklaus, M. Aubuchon, G. Zapantis, P. Li, H. Qian, B. Isaac, M. Y. Kim, G. Adel, J. W. Pollard, and N. F. Santoro Assessment of the proliferative status of epithelial cell types in the endometrium of young and menopausal transition women Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2007; 22(6): 1778 - 1788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. K. Bristol-Gould, C. G. Hutten, C. Sturgis, S. M. Kilen, K. E. Mayo, and T. K. Woodruff The Development of a Mouse Model of Ovarian Endosalpingiosis Endocrinology, December 1, 2005; 146(12): 5228 - 5236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. S. Malhi, G. P. Adams, and J. Singh Bovine Model for the Study of Reproductive Aging in Women: Follicular, Luteal, and Endocrine Characteristics Biol Reprod, July 1, 2005; 73(1): 45 - 53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Miro and L.J. Aspinall The onset of the initial rise in follicle-stimulating hormone during the human menstrual cycle Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2005; 20(1): 96 - 100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |
