This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a related Letter to the Editor Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Copyright Permission Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Passos, V. Q. Articles by Bronstein, M. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Passos, V. Q. Articles by Bronstein, M. D.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Prolactinomas: Normoprolactinemia after Bromocriptine Withdrawal

Neuroendocrine Unit, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo Medical School, 05403-000, São Paulo, Brazil

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Marcello D. Bronstein, M.D., Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Hospital DAS Clinicas, Faculdade de Medicina DA USP, R. Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, 7°. Andar Sala 7037, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. E-mail: . mdbronstein{at}uol.com.br

Abstract

Bromocriptine (BRC) and other dopamine agonist drugs are the first-choice treatment for prolactinomas. However, the major disadvantage is the need for prolonged therapy. We retrospectively studied 131 patients [62 microprolactinoma (MIC), 69 macroprolactinoma (MAC)], who achieved serum prolactin (PRL) normalization during BRC use. Twenty-seven percent of them (31% MIC and 69% MAC) underwent previous surgery. Twenty-seven patients (20.6%: 25.8% MIC and 15.9% MAC) persisted with normoprolactinemia after a median time of 44 months of BRC withdrawal. The median time of BRC use was 47 months. There were no statistically significant differences regarding age, gender, BRC initial dose, length of BRC use, tumor size, pregnancy during treatment, previous surgery, or radiotherapy among patients who persisted with normoprolactinemia and those who did not, using both univariate and multivariate analysis. BRC-induced prolactinoma cell alterations are highly controversial; and so, whether the mechanism of PRL normalization after BRC withdrawal is related to BRC use or whether it is attributable to natural history is a matter for debate. A periodic assessment of PRL levels during BRC (and other dopamine-agonist drugs) withdrawal is recommended to avoid the unnecessary maintenance of therapy in a subset of patients with prolactinomas.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Klibanski Dopamine Agonist Therapy in Prolactinomas: When Can Treatment Be Discontinued? J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2009; 94(7): 2247 - 2249. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Schlechte Long-Term Management of Prolactinomas J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2007; 92(8): 2861 - 2865. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. P. Gillam, M. E. Molitch, G. Lombardi, and A. Colao Advances in the Treatment of Prolactinomas Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2006; 27(5): 485 - 534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Colao, A. Di Sarno, P. Cappabianca, C. Di Somma, R. Pivonello, and G. Lombardi Withdrawal of Long-Term Cabergoline Therapy for Tumoral and Nontumoral Hyperprolactinemia N. Engl. J. Med., November 20, 2003; 349(21): 2023 - 2033. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Schlechte Prolactinoma N. Engl. J. Med., November 20, 2003; 349(21): 2035 - 2041. [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Serri, C. L. Chik, E. Ur, and S. Ezzat Diagnosis and management of hyperprolactinemia Can. Med. Assoc. J., September 16, 2003; 169(6): 575 - 581. [Abstract] [Full Text]