| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Other Original Articles |
Lundberg Laboratory for Diabetes Research (M.S., S.G., L.S., P.L.) and Wallenberg Laboratory (A.H.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg S-413 45, Sweden; and Department of Clinical Physiology (K.E.), Karolinska Hospital, S-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Mikaela Sjöstrand, M.D., Lundberg Laboratory for Diabetes Research, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, S-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden. E-mail: . mikaela. sjostrand{at}medic.gu.se
Abstract
The aim of this project was to study the regulation of interstitial glycerol levels in muscle in normal subjects, and to estimate interstitial muscle glycerol in obese subjects and patients with type 2 diabetes. In healthy lean subjects, microdialysis of forearm sc and muscle tissue were combined with arterial and deep venous catheterization, as well as blood flow registrations during oral glucose ingestion. In two other separate studies, obese (n = 9) vs. lean (n = 10) subjects and type 2 diabetes patients (n = 8) vs. weight-matched control subjects (n = 8) were investigated by means of muscle microdialysis during a euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp. Oral glucose ingestion suppressed the interstitial sc glycerol concentration by approximately 40% (P < 0.05), whereas no significant reduction of muscle interstitial glycerol was found. In contrast to the significant muscle interstitial-arterial (I-A) glycerol difference, the venous-arterial difference was small and varying throughout the oral glucose tolerance test. At steady-state hyperinsulinemia, obese subjects interstitial muscle glycerol and I-A glycerol difference were both significantly higher than lean controls, whereas type 2 diabetes patient had interstitial muscle glycerol concentrations and I-A glycerol differences similar to those found in weight-matched controls. A significant and marked I-A glycerol difference exists in the absence of a significant venous-arterial difference, indicating that muscle glycerol cannot be taken as a marker of intramyocellular lipolysis because local turnover of muscle glycerol might be significant. The present data also suggest that, in contrast to sc tissue, muscle tissue lacks a clear antilipolytic effect of insulin. Moreover, the muscle interstitial glycerol concentration is elevated in obese patients but does not precipitate insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. W.E. Jocken, C. Roepstorff, G. H. Goossens, P. van der Baan, M. van Baak, W. H.M. Saris, B. Kiens, and E. E. Blaak Hormone-Sensitive Lipase Serine Phosphorylation and Glycerol Exchange Across Skeletal Muscle in Lean and Obese Subjects: Effect of {beta}-Adrenergic Stimulation Diabetes, July 1, 2008; 57(7): 1834 - 1841. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Qvisth, E. Hagstrom-Toft, S. Enoksson, E. Moberg, P. Arner, and J. Bolinder Human Skeletal Muscle Lipolysis Is More Responsive to Epinephrine Than to Norepinephrine Stimulation in Vivo J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2006; 91(2): 665 - 670. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Qvisth, E. Hagstrom-Toft, S. Enoksson, R. S. Sherwin, S. Sjoberg, and J. Bolinder Combined Hyperinsulinemia and Hyperglycemia, But Not Hyperinsulinemia Alone, Suppress Human Skeletal Muscle Lipolytic Activity in Vivo J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2004; 89(9): 4693 - 4700. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. C. C. Navegantes, M. Sjostrand, S. Gudbjornsdottir, L. Strindberg, M. Elam, and P. Lonnroth Regulation and Counterregulation of Lipolysis in Vivo: Different Roles of Sympathetic Activation and Insulin J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2003; 88(11): 5515 - 5520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E. Kelley, T. M. McKolanis, R. A. F. Hegazi, L. H. Kuller, and S. C. Kalhan Fatty liver in type 2 diabetes mellitus: relation to regional adiposity, fatty acids, and insulin resistance Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, October 1, 2003; 285(4): E906 - E916. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |