help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Popovic, V.
Right arrow Articles by Casanueva, F. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Popovic, V.
Right arrow Articles by Casanueva, F. F.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 87, No. 5 2095-2099
Copyright © 2002 by The Endocrine Society


Endocrine Care

The Impact of Cranial Irradiation on GH Responsiveness to GHRH Plus GH-Releasing Peptide-6

Vera Popovic, Sandra Pekic, Ivana Golubicic, Mira Doknic, Carlos Dieguez and Felipe F. Casanueva

Institute of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Diseases of Metabolism, University Clinical Center (V.P., S.P., M.D.), Institute of Radiology and Oncology (I.G.), 11000 Belgrade, Yugoslavia; and Department of Physiology (C.D.) and Medicine (F.F.C.), Endocrine Division, Santiago de Compostela University, E15780 Santiago de Compostela, Spain

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Prof. Dr. Vera Popovic, Institute Endocrinology, Diabetes mellitus and Metabolism, University Clinical Center, Dr. Subotic 13, 11000 Belgrade, Yugoslavia. E-mail: . popver{at}eunet.yu

Abstract

Patients treated with cranial radiation are at risk of GH deficiency (GHD). We evaluated somatotroph responsiveness to maximal provocative tests exploring the GH releasable pool in relation to the impact of radiation damage to the hypothalamic-pituitary unit. The GH-releasing effect of GHRH plus GH secretagogue [GH-releasing peptide (GHRP)-6] (GHRH+GHRP-6) was studied in 22 adult patients (age, 23.2 ± 1.4 yr; 8 female and 14 male; mean body mass index, 22.6 ± 0.7 kg/m2) who received cranial radiation for primary brain tumor distant from hypothalamic-pituitary region 7.6 ± 0.7 yr before GH testing. Two stimulatory tests for GH secretion were employed: insulin tolerance test (ITT, 0.15 IU/kg regular insulin iv bolus); and GHRH+GHRP-6 test: GHRH (Geref Serono, Madrid, Spain; l µg/kg) plus GHRP-6 (CLINALFA, Laufelingen, Switzerland; 1 µg/kg) as iv bolus. Serum GH was measured (Delphia; Perkin Elmer, Wallac, Turku, Finland) at -30, -15, 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min. Anterior pituitary function was normal in all except in 1 female with hyperprolactinemia. Twelve out of 22 irradiated patients were GH-deficient (GHD) with both tests. Eleven out of 22 (50%) irradiated patients were severely GHD, according to the ITT (GH < 3 µg/liter; mean GH peak, 1.5 ± 0.5 µg/liter). In 9 irradiated patients, in whom ITT was performed as well, mean peak GH after the GHRH+GHRP-6 test was 6.2 ± 0.8 µg/liter, which is considered as severe GHD, according to our own cut-off for the test (peak GH < 10 µg/liter). GH responses to both tests were highly concordant, but the differential in the GH peak concentrations between GHD and non-GHD irradiated patients was significantly larger for the GHRH+GHRP-6 test than that for the ITT. The 2 discordant responses, i.e. poor response to the ITT and good response to the GHRH+GHRP-6 test, were found in 1 hyperprolactinemic female patient and in 1 other female. One irradiated patient was diagnosed as GHD only with the combined test, because ITT was contraindicated because of epilepsy. PRL and cortisol responses to ITT were normal in all irradiated patients and did not depend on the GH status. IGF-I levels were not informative or discriminative between the GHD and non-GHD irradiated adult patients. In conclusion, the use of GH secretagogues plus GHRH is an easy, reliable and accurate way of assessing GH secretion in cranially irradiated patients. Impairment of the GH releasable pool in the irradiated patients, with a maximal provocative test, reflects alterations in the hypothalamic-pituitary unit caused by radiotherapy.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
K. Chihara, A. Shimatsu, N. Hizuka, T. Tanaka, Y. Seino, Y. Katofor, and the KP-102 Study Group
A simple diagnostic test using GH-releasing peptide-2 in adult GH deficiency
Eur. J. Endocrinol., July 1, 2007; 157(1): 19 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. E. Lerner, G. J. M. Huang, D. McMahon, C. A. Sklar, and S. E. Oberfield
Growth Hormone Therapy in Children after Cranial/Craniospinal Radiation Therapy: Sexually Dimorphic Outcomes
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2004; 89(12): 6100 - 6104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2002 by The Endocrine Society