help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Decker, R.
Right arrow Articles by Sippell, W. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Decker, R.
Right arrow Articles by Sippell, W. G.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 87, No. 4 1634-1639
Copyright © 2002 by The Endocrine Society


Endocrine Care

Combined Treatment with Testosterone (T) and Ethinylestradiol (EE2) in Constitutionally Tall Boys: Is Treatment with T Plus EE2 More Effective in Reducing Final Height in Tall Boys than T Alone?

Ralph Decker, Carl-Joachim Partsch and Wolfgang G. Sippell

Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Christian-Albrechts University, Kiel 24105, Germany

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Prof. Dr. Wolfgang G. Sippell, Department of Pediatrics, Schwanenweg 20, D-24105 Kiel, Germany. E-mail: . sippell{at}pediatrics.uni-kiel.de

Abstract

Estrogens have been shown to rapidly inhibit longitudinal growth in tall boys. To antagonize the initial growth accelerating effect of T, 41 boys with an initial height prediction in excess of 203 cm were treated prospectively with either T enanthate (TE) 250 mg/wk im in combination with ethinylestradiol (EE2) 0.1 mg/d taken orally for the first 5.8 ± 0.47 wk (mean ± SE) of treatment (group 1, n = 20) or with TE alone (group 2, n = 21). Patients were randomized to one or the other treatment regimen. Mean (±SE) predicted adult height was 206.8 ± 0.7 cm in group 1 and 206.4 ± 0.8 cm in group 2. Total duration of treatment was 16.1 ± 0.8 months and 14.0 ± 1.2 months in group 1 and 2, respectively (NS). EE2-induced side effects in group 1 (gynecomastia) were limited and fully reversible. No negative long-term sequelae were found at final height with respect to hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis activity and to testis volumes. Although there was a tendency to a lower initial growth velocity measured by knemometry in group 1 (0.30 ± 0.05 vs. 0.38 ± 0.05 mm/wk, NS), final height did not differ in both study groups (195.0 ± 0.8 cm in group 1, 194.6 ± 0.8 cm in group 2). Similarly, height reduction (initial predicted adult height minus final height) was not significantly different between the two groups (12.0 ± 0.9 cm in group 1, 11.7 ± 0.9 cm in group 2). In conclusion, the addition of EE2 during the initial treatment phase to high-dose T in tall boys has no significant effect on height reduction. The results of this clinical trial suggest that the initial growth inhibiting effect of EE2 on the epiphyseal growth plates is overridden by the long-term administration of high dose TE.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2002 by The Endocrine Society