This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a related Letter to the Editor Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Copyright Permission Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bucci, A. Articles by Schneider, A. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bucci, A. Articles by Schneider, A. B. Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH Medline Plus Health Information Radiation Therapy Thyroid Cancer

Behavior of Small Thyroid Cancers Found by Screening Radiation-Exposed Individuals

Section of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Illinois College of Medicine (A.B., E.S.-F., T.G., D.M., A.B.S.), Chicago, Illinois 60612; Michael Reese Hospital (E.S.-F.,T.G., A.B.S.), Chicago, Illinois 60616; and Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute (E.R.), Bethesda, Maryland 20892

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Arthur B. Schneider, M.D., Ph.D., Section of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Illinois, 1819 West Polk Street, MC 640, Chicago, Illinois 60612. E-mail: abschnei{at}uic.edu

Abstract

Thyroid cancers detected by screening irradiated individuals are often small and of uncertain clinical significance. We retrospectively analyzed the effect of screening in a cohort of 4296 individuals exposed to radiation as children in the 1940s and 1950s and followed by us from 1974 until the present. We compared the thyroid cancers diagnosed before 1974 (122 cases, routine care) with the cancers found in subjects screened by us after 1974 (172 cases, screened), using cancer recurrence as the end point. Screening included a thyroid scan or, more recently, thyroid ultrasound. As expected, many of the cancers found by screening were very small (52% were <10 mm), but the range of tumor sizes overlapped those found by routine care. The recurrence rate was significantly lower in the cases found by screening, but when the comparison was limited to cancers 10 mm or larger, no difference in the recurrence rates was seen. This would suggest that the lower recurrence rate observed for small thyroid cancers detected at screening was due to earlier diagnosis rather than more effective treatment. By univariate analysis, four factors were associated with an increased risk of recurrence of small (<10 mm) thyroid cancers: short latency (i.e. a shorter time interval between the radiation exposure and the first thyroid surgery), lymph node metastases present at diagnosis, multifocal cancers, and higher radiation dose. In a multivariate analysis combining the four risk factors, only short latency was significant. As thyroid cancers that escape detection by routine means should be diagnosed at screening, and both large and small thyroid cancers have the potential to recur, screening may be of value, but only if groups with a sufficiently high prevalence of thyroid cancer can be identified to offset the adverse effects of unnecessary treatment due to false positive results.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Brignardello, A. Corrias, G. Isolato, N. Palestini, L. Cordero di Montezemolo, F. Fagioli, and G. Boccuzzi Ultrasound Screening for Thyroid Carcinoma in Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Case Series J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2008; 93(12): 4840 - 4843. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. V. Mihailescu and A. B. Schneider Size, Number, and Distribution of Thyroid Nodules and the Risk of Malignancy in Radiation-Exposed Patients Who Underwent Surgery J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2008; 93(6): 2188 - 2193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Mihailescu, E. Shore-Freedman, S. Mukani, J. Lubin, E. Ron, and A. B. Schneider Multiple Neoplasms in an Irradiated Cohort: Pattern of Occurrence and Relationship to Thyroid Cancer Outcome J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2002; 87(7): 3236 - 3241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]