help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Gertz, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Gertz, B. J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Osteoporosis
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 86, No. 3 1116-1125
Copyright © 2001 by The Endocrine Society


Original Studies

Effect of Alendronate and MK-677 (a Growth Hormone Secretagogue), Individually and in Combination, on Markers of Bone Turnover and Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Osteoporotic Women1

M. G. Murphy, S. Weiss, M. McClung, T. Schnitzer2, K. Cerchio, J. Connor, D. Krupa, B. J. Gertz and for the MK-677/Alendronate Study Group3

Merck Research Laboratories (M.G.M., K.C., J.C., S.R., D.K., B.J.G.), Rahway, New Jersey 07065-0900; San Diego Endocrine and Medical Clinic (S.W.), San Diego, California 92108; Oregon Osteoporosis Center (M.M.), Portland, Oregon 07213; Rush-Presbyterian St. Lukes Medical Center (T.S.), Chicago, Illinois 60612

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: M. Gail Murphy, M.D., Merck Research Laboratories, Building 10, Sentry Parkway, Bluebell, Pennsylvania 19422. E-mail: gail_murphy{at}merck.com

GH increases bone turnover and stimulates osteoblast activity. We hypothesized that administration of MK-677, an orally active GH secretagogue, together with alendronate, a potent inhibitor of bone resorption, would maintain a higher bone formation rate relative to that seen with alendronate alone, thereby generating greater enhancement of bone mineral density (BMD) in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. We determined the individual and combined effects of MK-677 and alendronate administration on insulin-like growth factor I levels and biochemical markers of bone formation (osteocalcin and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase) and resorption [urinary N-telopeptide cross-links (NTx)] for 12 months and BMD for 18 months.

In a multicenter, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, 18-month study, 292 women (64–85 yr old) with low femoral neck BMD were randomly assigned in a 3:3:1:1 ratio to 1 of 4 daily treatment groups for 12 months: MK-677 (25 mg) plus alendronate (10 mg); alendronate (10 mg); MK-677 (25 mg); or a double dummy placebo. Patients who received MK-677 alone or placebo through month 12 received MK-677 (25 mg) plus alendronate (10 mg) from months 12–18. All other patients remained on their assigned therapy. All patients received 500 mg/day calcium.

The primary results, except for BMD, are provided for month 12. MK-677, with or without alendronate, increased insulin-like growth factor I levels from baseline (39% and 45%; P < 0.05 vs. placebo). MK-677 increased osteocalcin and urinary NTx by 22% and 41%, on the average, respectively (P < 0.05 vs. placebo). MK-677 and alendronate mitigated the reduction in bone formation compared with alendronate alone based on mean relative changes in serum osteocalcin (-40% vs. -54%; P < 0.05, combination vs. alendronate) and reduced the effect of alendronate on resorption (NTx) as well (-52% vs. -61%; P < 0.05, combination vs. alendronate). MK-677 plus alendronate increased BMD at the femoral neck (4.2% vs. 2.5% for alendronate; P < 0.05). However, similar enhancement was not seen with MK-677 plus alendronate in BMD of the lumbar spine, total hip, or total body compared with alendronate alone. GH-mediated side effects were noted in the groups receiving MK-677, although adverse events resulting in discontinuation from the study were relatively infrequent. In conclusion, the anabolic effect of GH, as produced through the GH secretagogue MK-677, attenuated the indirect suppressive effect of alendronate on bone formation, but did not translate into significant increases in BMD at sites other than the femoral neck. Although the femoral neck is an important site for fracture prevention, the lack of enhancement in bone mass at other sites compared with that seen with alendronate alone is a concern when weighed against the potential side effects of enhanced GH secretion.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
R. G. SMITH, Y. SUN, H. JIANG, R. ALBARRAN-ZECKLER, and N. TIMCHENKO
Ghrelin Receptor (GHS-R1A) Agonists Show Potential as Interventive Agents during Aging
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., November 1, 2007; 1119(1): 147 - 164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
Y. Sun, J. M. Garcia, and R. G. Smith
Ghrelin and Growth Hormone Secretagogue Receptor Expression in Mice during Aging
Endocrinology, March 1, 2007; 148(3): 1323 - 1329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
H. Jiang, L. Betancourt, and R. G. Smith
Ghrelin Amplifies Dopamine Signaling by Cross Talk Involving Formation of Growth Hormone Secretagogue Receptor/Dopamine Receptor Subtype 1 Heterodimers
Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2006; 20(8): 1772 - 1785.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
B. Holst, E. Brandt, A. Bach, A. Heding, and T. W. Schwartz
Nonpeptide and Peptide Growth Hormone Secretagogues Act Both as Ghrelin Receptor Agonist and as Positive or Negative Allosteric Modulators of Ghrelin Signaling
Mol. Endocrinol., September 1, 2005; 19(9): 2400 - 2411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
R. G. Smith
Development of Growth Hormone Secretagogues
Endocr. Rev., May 1, 2005; 26(3): 346 - 360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
R. G. Smith, L. Betancourt, and Y. Sun
Molecular Endocrinology and Physiology of the Aging Central Nervous System
Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2005; 26(2): 203 - 250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
A. J. van der Lely, M. Tschop, M. L. Heiman, and E. Ghigo
Biological, Physiological, Pathophysiological, and Pharmacological Aspects of Ghrelin
Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2004; 25(3): 426 - 457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
Y. Sun, S. Ahmed, and R. G. Smith
Deletion of Ghrelin Impairs neither Growth nor Appetite
Mol. Cell. Biol., November 15, 2003; 23(22): 7973 - 7981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
N. M. Thompson, J. S Davies, A. Mode, P. A. Houston, and T. Wells
Pattern-Dependent Suppression of Growth Hormone (GH) Pulsatility by Ghrelin and GH-Releasing Peptide-6 in Moderately GH-Deficient Rats
Endocrinology, November 1, 2003; 144(11): 4859 - 4867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2001 by The Endocrine Society