This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a related Letter to the Editor Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Copyright Permission Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pascoe-Lira, D. Articles by Leaños-Miranda, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pascoe-Lira, D. Articles by Leaños-Miranda, A. Pubmed/NCBI databases Substance via MeSH Medline Plus Health Information Pregnancy

Frequency of Macroprolactinemia Due to Autoantibodies against Prolactin in Pregnant Women

Autoimmunity Laboratory (D.P.-L., I.C.-H., L.M.-A., F.B.-F., A.L.-M.), Immunology Research Unit, Hospital de Pediatría; and Biochemistry Research Unit (G.D.-R.), Hospital de Especialidades, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, México, D.F., México 06725

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Alfredo Leaños-Miranda, Autoimmunity Laboratory, Immunology Research Unit, Hospital de Pediatría, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Avenida Cuauhtémoc 330, Col. Doctores, CP 06725 México, D.F., México. E-mail: alfredo{at}intranet.com.mx

Abstract

The frequency of macroprolactinemia related to the presence of anti-PRL autoantibodies in the serum of 209 healthy women at different stages of pregnancy was studied. Measurements were taken of serum PRL concentrations before and after chromatographic separation (gel filtration and affinity with proteins A and G) and extraction of free PRL with polyethylene glycol (PEG). Sera from 8 of the 209 women (3.8%) were found to have a significantly high proportion of precipitated PRL by PEG (macroprolactinemia); in these patients, gel filtration showed that a substantial amount of big big PRL (molecular mass >100 kDa) was present (19.0–78.2% vs. 3.8–4.9%, P = 0.009 in normal pregnant women with a normal proportion of precipitated PRL by PEG). The presence of macroprolactinemia was attributable to anti-PRL autoantibodies in 5 of the 8 women. Comparison of serum levels of direct and free PRL between women with macroprolactinemia related to anti-PRL autoantibodies and women without macroprolactinemia showed significant differences (direct PRL: 270.2 ± 86.9 vs. 203.4 ± 69.0 µg/L, P = 0.04; and free PRL: 107.0 ± 75.9 vs. 173.3 ± 67.6 µg/L, P = 0.002). On the other hand, there was no difference between women with macroprolactinemia not related to anti-PRL autoantibodies and women with macroprolactinemia caused by anti-PRL autoantibodies, nor was there a difference between women with macroprolactinemia not related to anti-PRL autoantibodies and women without macroprolactinemia. There was a positive correlation between titers of the anti-PRL autoantibody and serum PRL levels (r = 0.82, P = 0.09). The presence of the anti-PRL autoantibody had no relation to the patient’s age, stage of gestation, or number of previous pregnancies. We concluded that the frequency of macroprolactinemia was 3.8% among healthy, pregnant women, which was caused by a anti-PRL autoantibodies in 62.5% of the cases. The autoantibodies were found in the bloodstream, forming a PRL-IgG complex, in accordance with the following observations: 1) immunoreactive PRL on gel filtration was eluted in the fractions corresponding to the molecular mass of IgG (150 kDa); 2) a significantly high proportion of immunoreactive PRL was retained on an affinity gel for IgG (proteins A and G); and 3) a significantly high proportion of serum PRL bound to IgG was precipitated by protein A. There was a positive correlation between titers of anti-PRL autoantibodies and serum PRL levels. Serum levels of total PRL were higher, and serum levels of free PRL were lower, in pregnant women with anti-PRL autoantibodies than in pregnant women without macroprolactinemia.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Leanos-Miranda, J. Marquez-Acosta, G. M. Cardenas-Mondragon, Z. L. Chinolla-Arellano, R. Rivera-Leanos, S. Bermejo-Huerta, J. F. Romero-Arauz, G. Alvarez-Jimenez, J. C. Ramos-Leon, and A. Ulloa-Aguirre Urinary Prolactin as a Reliable Marker for Preeclampsia, Its Severity, and the Occurrence of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2008; 93(7): 2492 - 2499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Leanos-Miranda, G. Cardenas-Mondragon, A. Ulloa-Aguirre, I. Isordia-Salas, A. Parra, and J. Ramirez-Peredo Anti-prolactin autoantibodies in pregnant women with systemic lupus erythematosus: maternal and fetal outcome Lupus, May 1, 2007; 16(5): 342 - 349. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Hattori, Y. Nakayama, K. Kitagawa, T. Li, and C. Inagaki Development of Anti-PRL (Prolactin) Autoantibodies by Homologous PRL in Rats: A Model for Macroprolactinemia Endocrinology, May 1, 2007; 148(5): 2465 - 2470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N Hattori, Y Nakayama, K Kitagawa, T Ishihara, Y Saiki, and C Inagaki Anti-prolactin (PRL) autoantibody-binding sites (epitopes) on PRL molecule in macroprolactinemia. J. Endocrinol., August 1, 2006; 190(2): 287 - 293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Leanos-Miranda and G. Cardenas-Mondragon Serum free prolactin concentrations in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus are associated with lupus activity Rheumatology, January 1, 2006; 45(1): 97 - 101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Hattori, K. Ikekubo, Y. Nakaya, K. Kitagawa, and C. Inagaki Immunoglobulin G Subclasses and Prolactin (PRL) Isoforms in Macroprolactinemia Due to Anti-PRL Autoantibodies J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2005; 90(5): 3036 - 3044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]