| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Endocrine Care |
Departments of Endocrinology (W.J.I., T.C.R.P., M.J.E., J.H.L., R.A.D.), Christchurch Hospital and Obstetrics and Gynecology (L.H., R.R., P.S.B.), Christchurch Womens Hospital, Christchurch, 8001 New Zealand
Address all correspondence to: Dr. M. Jane Ellis, Department of Endocrinology, Christchurch Hospital, Private Bag 4710, Christchurch, 8001 New Zealand. E-mail: jane.ellis{at}cdhb.govt.nz
Abstract
It has been suggested that CRH is a placental clock that controls the duration of pregnancy and that the timing of the rise in CRH may permit prediction of the onset of labor. We have performed a prospective longitudinal study, in 297 women, to examine the utility of a single second-trimester plasma CRH measurement to predict preterm delivery. Venous blood samples were taken at 4-weekly intervals, beginning at 1620 wk gestation, until delivery for CRH and its binding protein. A time point at which a single plasma CRH test might give optimal data to predict preterm delivery was determined. Thirty-one subjects delivered prematurely (10.4%). Sampling for plasma CRH at 26 wk gestation seemed the optimal time point to maximize sensitivity and specificity of the test. The mean (± SD) plasma CRH in women at this gestation who eventually delivered after spontaneous labor within 1 wk of their due date (3941 wk, n = 127) was 34.7 ± 27.0 pM. A plasma CRH of more than 90 pM at 26 wk gestation had a sensitivity of 45% and a specificity of 94% for prediction of preterm delivery. The positive predictive value was 46.7%. Calculation of free CRH did not improve these figures. In conclusion, a single measurement of plasma CRH, toward the end of the second trimester, may identify a group at risk for preterm delivery, but over 50% of such deliveries will be unpredicted. These data do not support the routine clinical use of plasma CRH as a predictor of preterm labor.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. R. Norwitz A Blood Test to Predict Preterm Birth: Don't Mess with Maternal-Fetal Stress J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2009; 94(6): 1886 - 1889. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Smith, J. I. Smith, X. Shen, P. J. Engel, M. E. Bowman, S. A. McGrath, A. M. Bisits, P. McElduff, W. B. Giles, and D. W. Smith Patterns of Plasma Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone, Progesterone, Estradiol, and Estriol Change and the Onset of Human Labor J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2009; 94(6): 2066 - 2074. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T Dwyer, L Blizzard, B Patterson, A-L Ponsonby, K Martin, S Quinn, M M Sale, S M Richards, R Morley, S Rich, et al. Association between birth weight and adolescent systolic blood pressure in a caucasian birth cohort differs according to skin type, CRH promoter or 11{beta}-HSD2 genotype Arch. Dis. Child., September 1, 2008; 93(9): 760 - 767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Madhappan, D. Kempuraj, S. Christodoulou, S. Tsapikidis, W. Boucher, V. Karagiannis, A. Athanassiou, and T. C. Theoharides High Levels of Intrauterine Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone, Urocortin, Tryptase, and Interleukin-8 in Spontaneous Abortions Endocrinology, June 1, 2003; 144(6): 2285 - 2290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |