This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a related Letter to the Editor Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints, Permissions and Rights Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wastney, M. E. Articles by Weaver, C. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wastney, M. E. Articles by Weaver, C. M.

Changes in Calcium Kinetics in Adolescent Girls Induced by High Calcium Intake¹

Division of Neonatology (M.E.W.), Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007; Department of Foods and Nutrition (B.R.M., L.A.J., C.M.W.), Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana; Indiana University School of Medicine (M.P.), Indianapolis, Indiana; and Department of Chemistry (D.S., X.-Y.J.), University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Meryl E. Wastney, Ph.D., DRC, Private Bag 3123, Hamilton, New Zealand. E-mail: wastneym{at}drc.co.nz

To identify the mechanism/s whereby calcium retention is increased by calcium intake in adolescent girls, kinetic studies were performed using stable calcium isotope tracers. Girls (n = 10; 12 ± 1 yr old, mean ± SD) were studied while on a controlled diet containing a low (21.2 mmol/day) and a high (47.4 mmol/day) calcium intake, in randomized order, using a cross-over design. Studies were separated by 1 month. Calcium tracers were administered after 1 week on the study diet, orally and iv; and serum, urine, and feces were collected for the following 14 days. Tracers were measured using fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry, and kinetic data were analyzed by compartmental modeling. Biochemical markers of bone turnover were measured in serum and urine samples. On high (compared with low) calcium intake, fractional absorption did not differ, absorbed calcium increased (19.6 ± 7.5 vs. 8.0 ± 2.5 mmol/day, mean ± SD, P < 0.001), calcium excreted in urine increased (2.8 ± 1.7 vs. 2.1 ± 1.1 mmol/day, P < 0.01), calcium retained in bone increased (14.5 ± 8.9 vs. 3.2 ± 3.6 mmol/day, P < 0.001), bone formation did not change, and bone resorption decreased by 32%. These changes, measured by kinetics, were corroborated by changes in markers of bone turnover. We conclude that increased bone retention of calcium, with high calcium intake in adolescent girls, is attributable to an increase in absorption and a decrease in bone resorption.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Peacock Calcium Metabolism in Health and Disease Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2010; 5(Supplement_1): S23 - S30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Seiquer, M. Mesias, A. Munoz Hoyos, G. Galdo, and M. P. Navarro A Mediterranean Dietary Style Improves Calcium Utilization in Healthy Male Adolescents J. Am. Coll. Nutr., August 1, 2008; 27(4): 454 - 462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Atkinson, G. P. McCabe, C. M. Weaver, S. A. Abrams, and K. O. O'Brien Are Current Calcium Recommendations for Adolescents Higher than Needed to Achieve Optimal Peak Bone Mass? The Controversy J. Nutr., June 1, 2008; 138(6): 1182 - 1186. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Braun, C. Palacios, K. Wigertz, L. A Jackman, R. J Bryant, L. D McCabe, B. R Martin, G. P McCabe, M. Peacock, and C. M Weaver Racial differences in skeletal calcium retention in adolescent girls with varied controlled calcium intakes Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2007; 85(6): 1657 - 1663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. P. Heaney and C. M. Weaver Newer Perspectives on Calcium Nutrition and Bone Quality J. Am. Coll. Nutr., December 1, 2005; 24(suppl_6): 574S - 581S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. P. Heaney Measuring What Isn't There Clin. Chem., November 1, 2005; 51(11): 2003 - 2004. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Prentice, F. Ginty, S. J. Stear, S. C. Jones, M. A. Laskey, and T. J. Cole Calcium Supplementation Increases Stature and Bone Mineral Mass of 16- to 18-Year-Old Boys J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2005; 90(6): 3153 - 3161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Matkovic, P. K Goel, N. E Badenhop-Stevens, J. D Landoll, B. Li, J. Z Ilich, M. Skugor, L. A Nagode, S. L Mobley, E.-J. Ha, et al. Calcium supplementation and bone mineral density in females from childhood to young adulthood: a randomized controlled trial Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2005; 81(1): 175 - 188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. L Newmark, R. P Heaney, and P. A Lachance Should calcium and vitamin D be added to the current enrichment program for cereal-grain products? Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2004; 80(2): 264 - 270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Weaver 2003 W. O. Atwater Memorial Lecture: Defining Nutrient Requirements from a Perspective of Bone-Related Nutrients J. Nutr., December 1, 2003; 133(12): 4063 - 4066. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. F. Staub, E. Foos, B. Courtin, R. Jochemsen, and A. M. Perault-Staub A nonlinear compartmental model of Sr metabolism. I. Non-steady-state kinetics and model building Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, March 1, 2003; 284(3): R819 - R834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Dibba, A. Prentice, M. Ceesay, M. Mendy, S. Darboe, D. M Stirling, T. J Cole, and E. M. Poskitt Bone mineral contents and plasma osteocalcin concentrations of Gambian children 12 and 24 mo after the withdrawal of a calcium supplement Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2002; 76(3): 681 - 686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]