This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a related Letter to the Editor Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Copyright Permission Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rainis, T. Articles by Dickstein, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rainis, T. Articles by Dickstein, G. Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH Hazardous Substances DB HYDROCORTISONE

False Positive Metaiodobenzylguanidine Scan in a Patient with a Huge Adrenocortical Carcinoma

Division of Endocrinology, Bnai-Zion Medical Center (T.R., G.D.), Haifa 31048; and Division of Radionuclear Medicine, Carmel Medical Center (S.B.-H.), Haifa 34362, Israel

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Gabriel Dickstein, Division of Endocrinology, Bnai Zion Medical Center, P.O. Box 4940, Haifa 31048, Israel.

We report a case of a 17-cm cortisol-secreting adrenocortical carcinoma in which [¹²³I]metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scan showed accumulation of the isotope in the area of the tumor. Catecholamine levels were normal, and no chromaffin cells were found in histological examination of the tumor. A literature review of previously described cases of false positive MIBG scans in the adrenal region is offered. We conclude that MIBG scans might not be as specific as previously thought in differentiating pheochromocytoma from adrenocortical carcinoma. They should be performed only when clinical suspicion and abnormalities in catecholamines advocate the need.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y Inoue, M Akahane, T Kitazawa, H Ijichi, S Obi, K Yoshikawa, K Ohtomo, and M Omata False positive uptake of metaiodobenzylguanidine in hepatocellular carcinoma Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2002; 75(894): 548 - 551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]