| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
From the Clinical Research Centers |
University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut 06030; and University of Heidelberg (M.J.S.), Heidelberg, Germany
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Karen M. Prestwood, M.D., Center on Aging, MC-5215, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut 06030-5215.
Previous studies have shown that treatment with estrogen or calcium decreases bone turnover in older women. The mechanisms by which estrogen and calcium exert their effects are probably different. We therefore examined the possibility of an additive or synergistic effect of combined treatment with calcium and low dose estrogen on bone turnover in older women, using biochemical markers.
Thirty-one healthy women over 70 yr of age were randomized to 12 weeks of treatment with either micronized 17ß-estradiol [0.5 mg/day Estrace (E2)] or 1500 mg/day elemental calcium, given as carbonate plus vitamin D (800 IU/day; Ca+D). At the end of the initial 12-week treatment period, both groups received both Ca+D and E2 for an additional 12 weeks. Eleven older women were followed for 36 weeks without any treatment and served as a control group.
Serum and urine were collected at baseline, at 12 and 24 weeks on treatment, and at 12 weeks after treatment was terminated for measurement of biochemical markers of bone turnover. Markers of bone formation were bone alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, and type I procollagen peptide; markers of bone resorption were urinary cross-linked C-telopeptides and N-telopeptides of type I collagen, serum cross-linked N-telopeptides of type I collagen, urinary free deoxypyridinoline cross-links, and serum bone sialoprotein. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to determine changes in bone turnover measures over time by group.
All markers of bone resorption decreased with initial treatment and decreased further with combination therapy (P < 0.001). Markers of bone formation decreased with Ca+D treatment, but not with E2 alone; there was no additional effect of combination therapy on formation markers compared to Ca+D alone. Neither markers of formation nor resorption changed in the control group.
These results suggest that there is an additive effect of low dose estrogen and calcium on bone resorption, but not on bone formation, in older women. Thus, the combination of low dose estrogen plus calcium is likely to be more effective in older women than either treatment alone.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Taxel, P. M. Fall, K. M. Prestwood, L. Dulipsingh, D. Dauser, C. Ohannessian, and L. G. Raisz Changes in Urinary Excretion of Helical Peptide during Therapy for Osteoporosis in Older Adults Clin. Chem., April 1, 2004; 50(4): 747 - 750. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Prestwood, A. M. Kenny, A. Kleppinger, and M. Kulldorff Ultralow-Dose Micronized 17{beta}-Estradiol and Bone Density and Bone Metabolism in Older Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial JAMA, August 27, 2003; 290(8): 1042 - 1048. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Iannuzzi-Sucich, K. M. Prestwood, and A. M. Kenny Prevalence of Sarcopenia and Predictors of Skeletal Muscle Mass in Healthy, Older Men and Women J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., December 1, 2002; 57(12): M772 - 777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Prestwood, A. M. Kenny, C. Unson, and M. Kulldorff The Effect of Low Dose Micronized 17{beta}-Estradiol on Bone Turnover, Sex Hormone Levels, and Side Effects in Older Women: A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2000; 85(12): 4462 - 4469. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Prestwood, M. Gunness, D. B. Muchmore, Y. Lu, M. Wong, and L. G. Raisz A Comparison of the Effects of Raloxifene and Estrogen on Bone in Postmenopausal Women J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2000; 85(6): 2197 - 2202. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. Z. Ilich and J. E. Kerstetter Nutrition in Bone Health Revisited: A Story Beyond Calcium J. Am. Coll. Nutr., June 1, 2000; 19(6): 715 - 737. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. P. Heaney Calcium, Dairy Products and Osteoporosis J. Am. Coll. Nutr., April 1, 2000; 19(90002): 83S - 99. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
B. L Specker Should there be a dietary guideline for calcium intake? No Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2000; 71(3): 661 - 664. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Cauley and J. Zmuda Hormonal Replacement--Effect on Bone Density J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 1999; 84(6): 1802 - 1803. [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |