help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cemeroglu, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Foster, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cemeroglu, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Foster, C. M.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 83, No. 10 3501-3506
Copyright © 1998 by The Endocrine Society


From the Clinical Research Centers

In Pubertal Girls, Naloxone Fails to Reverse the Suppression of Luteinizing Hormone Secretion by Estradiol1

Ayse Pinar Cemeroglu, Gad B. Kletter2, Wensheng Guo, Morton B. Brown, Robert P. Kelch3, John C. Marshall, Vasantha Padmanabhan and Carol M. Foster

Department of Pediatrics/Division of Endocrinology, University of Michigan Medical School (A.P.C., R.P.K., G.B.K., V.P., C.M.F.), and the Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health (W.G., M.B.B.), Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109; and the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Virginia (J.C.M.), Charlottesville, Virginia 22908

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Carol M. Foster, M.D., D3252 MPB, Box 0718, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109.

Estradiol (E2) negative feedback on LH secretion was examined in 10 pubertal girls, testing the hypothesis that E2 suppresses LH pulse frequency and amplitude through opioid pathways. At 1000 h, a 32-h saline infusion was given, followed 1 week later by an E2 infusion at 13.8 nmol/m2·h. During both infusions, four iv boluses of saline were given hourly beginning at 1200 h, and four naloxone iv boluses (0.1 mg/kg each) were given hourly beginning at 1200 h on the following day. Blood was obtained every 15 min for LH determination and every 60 min for E2 determination from 1200 h to the end of the infusion. E2 infusion increased the mean serum E2 concentration from 44 ± 17 to 112 ± 26 pmol/L (P < 0.01). The mean LH concentration between 2200–1200 h decreased from 3.19 ± 0.89 to 1.99 ± 0.65 IU/L (P = 0.014), and LH pulse amplitude decreased from 3.4 ± 0.6 to 2.6 ± 0.5 IU/L (P = 0.0076). Although there were 1.2 fewer pulses during E2 infusion compared to saline infusion, differences did not reach significance (P = 0.1; 95% confidence interval for the difference, -3.5, 1.1). Pituitary responsiveness to GnRH, assessed at the end of the infusion by administering 250 ng/kg GnRH iv, did not change during E2 infusion. The effect of naloxone blockade of opioid activity on LH secretion was determined by assessing the area under the curve (AUC) from 1200–1600 h. During saline infusion, the LH AUC was 1122 ± 375 IU/L during saline boluses and 1575 ± 403 IU/L during naloxone boluses (P = 0.39). When E2 was infused, the LH AUCs during saline and naloxone boluses were 865 ± 249 and 866 ± 250 IU/L, respectively. Thus, in pubertal girls: 1) E2 decreases the LH concentration and LH pulse amplitude; 2) the main site of negative feedback effect of E2 appears to be at the level of the hypothalamus; 3) an increase in LH secretion after naloxone administration could not be demonstrated in these girls and may depend on the maturity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis; and 4) opioid receptor blockade does not reverse the E2 inhibition of LH secretion even in the most mature girls. Thus, E2 suppression of LH secretion in pubertal girls appears to be mediated by a decrease in hypothalamic GnRH secretion that is independent of opioid pathways.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. R. McCartney, S. K. Blank, K. A. Prendergast, S. Chhabra, C. A. Eagleson, K. D. Helm, R. Yoo, R. J. Chang, C. M. Foster, S. Caprio, et al.
Obesity and Sex Steroid Changes across Puberty: Evidence for Marked Hyperandrogenemia in Pre- and Early Pubertal Obese Girls
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2007; 92(2): 430 - 436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
S.K. Blank, C.R. McCartney, and J.C. Marshall
The origins and sequelae of abnormal neuroendocrine function in polycystic ovary syndrome
Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2006; 12(4): 351 - 361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. M. Foster, D. J. Phillips, T. Wyman, L. W. Evans, N. P. Groome, and V. Padmanabhan
Changes in serum inhibin, activin and follistatin concentrations during puberty in girls
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2000; 15(5): 1052 - 1057.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1998 by The Endocrine Society