help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bettica, P.
Right arrow Articles by Norbiato, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bettica, P.
Right arrow Articles by Norbiato, G.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 82, No. 9 3034-3039
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society


Original Studies

Short-Term Variations in Bone Remodeling Biochemical Markers: Cyclical Etidronate and Alendronate Effects Compared

P. Bettica, M. Bevilacqua, T. Vago, M. Masino, E. Cucinotta and G. Norbiato

Department of Endocrinology, University-Hospital "L. Sacco (P.B., M.B., T.V., G.N.), Milan; and Assay Laboratory, USSL 44 (M.M., E.C.), Voghera Italy

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Paolo Bettica, M.D., Ph.D., Servizio di Endocrinologia, Ospedale "L. Sacco", Via G.B. Grassi 74, 20157 Milan, Italy.

Bone-remodeling markers have been proposed to monitor antiosteoporotic therapy, as substantial changes in these markers usually occur in a relatively short time interval. In this study we have evaluated the short term effects of two bisphosphonates on bone-remodeling markers with the aim of 1) defining the shortest reliable time interval after which markers should be measured, and 2) comparing the effects of different bisphophonates. To do so, 74 postmenopausal women with a lumbar spine t score of at least -1 were randomly allocated to 4 different treatments: calcium carbonate (500 mg/day; n = 18), 5 mg/day alendronate (A5; n = 18), 10 mg/day alendronate (A10; n = 20), and cyclical etidronate (CE; n = 18). Serum and 24-h urine samples were collected at baseline and 14, 28, 56, and 84 days after the beginning of therapy. Type I collagen N-terminal (NTx) and C-terminal (CTx) telopeptides and total deoxypyridinoline (tDPD) were measured in urine and normalized for urinary creatinine excretion. Osteocalcin and bone alkaline phosphatase in serum were measured. Alendronate (at both doses) and CE significantly decreased bone-remodeling markers, whereas calcium carbonate did not. Bone resorption markers reduction reached a plateau 14 (A10) or 28 (A5 and CE) days after the beginning of treatment, whereas osteocalcin and bone alkaline phosphatase were significantly reduced at 56 (A10) and 84 (CE) days. The global effects of alendronate and CE on NTx and CTx (calculated as the area under the curve) were significantly different from those of calcium (P < 0.05), but were not significantly different from each other. The percent change from baseline obtained with tDPD, NTx, or CTx during bisphosphonate treatment were significantly different (P < 0.05), but this difference disappeared when the variability in the calcium carbonate group was taken into account. In conclusion, this study shows that 1) etidronate and alendronate induce a significant and rapid reduction in bone-remodeling markers; 2) the changes in NTx, CTx, and tDPD urinary excretions reach a plateau after 2–4 wk of treatment; and 3) short term treatments with CE or alendronate induce similar changes in the urinary excretion of NTx and CTx.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society