help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yang, I.
Right arrow Articles by Choi, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yang, I.
Right arrow Articles by Choi, Y.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 82, No. 8 2492-2496
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society


Clinical Studies

Growth Hormone Response to the Hypothalamic Somatostatinergic Activity in Acromegalic Patients1

I. Yang, S. Park, J. Woo, S. Kim, J. Kim, Y. Kim and Y. Choi

Division of Endocrinology, Departments of Internal Medicine and Pharmacology (S.P), Kyunghee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Inmyung Yang, M.D., Ph.D., Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyunghee University School of Medicine, 1 Hoiki-dong, Dongdaemoon-Ku, 130–702 Seoul, Korea. E-mail: francis{at}chollian.dacom.co.kr

Oral glucose administration suppresses the TRH-induced TSH response by enhancing the hypothalamic somatostatinergic activity (HSA). We assessed the HSA in 13 acromegalic patients by measuring glucose-induced suppression of TRH-stimulated TSH secretion. The HSA showed wide variation with up to 64% suppression. The mean HSA of the patients (25 ± 6%) did not differ from that in normal young men (19 ± 4%) in our previous study. Six patients had normal or low HSA, and the other 7 patients had high HSA. The mean TRH-stimulated TSH levels of the patients with normal or low HSA was significantly lower than that of the patients with high HSA (5.13 ± 0.10 vs. 11.30 ± 2.80 mU/L). The HSA did not relate to sex, age, tumor size, basal GH levels, the paradoxical responses to TRH and GnRH, octreotide response, or the gsp oncogene. In the combined glucose-TRH test, glucose pretreatment completely suppressed the paradoxical increase in GH level at 30 min in 4 patients. However, it could suppress the paradoxical GH response by only 6–51% in the other 5 patients who also showed the paradoxical response in TRH test. The tumor diameter of patients with good response to the HSA was significantly larger than that of the patients with poor response (31 ± 5 vs. 14 ± 2 mm) as was the tumor grade (3.3 ± 0.3 vs. 1.7 ± 0.2). This study supports the idea that a reduction of HSA is not a primary cause of acromegaly, and the HSA seems to increase to suppress the autonomous secretion of GH from the pituitary adenomas. HSA as well as the response of tumors to HSA do not determine tumor growth.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society