help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bettica, P.
Right arrow Articles by Baylink, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bettica, P.
Right arrow Articles by Baylink, D. J.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 81, 542-546, Copyright © 1996 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Clinical performances of galactosyl hydroxylysine, pyridinoline, and deoxypyridinoline in postmenopausal osteoporosis

P Bettica, AK Taylor, J Talbot, L Moro, R Talamini and DJ Baylink
Department of Mineral Metabolism, Jerry L. Pettis Veterans Administration Hospital, Loma Linda, California 92357, USA.

We have previously shown that galactosyl hydroxylysine (GHYL), pyridinoline (PYD), and deoxypyridinoline (DPD) have a better accuracy and discriminate power than hydroxyproline in distinguishing postmenopausal osteoporotic women from premenopausal controls. In this study, we evaluated the clinical performances of GHYL, PYD, and DPD, alone or in combination, in distinguishing postmenopausal osteoporotic women (OPBD, n = 26) from age-matched controls (CBD, n = 19). The diagnosis of osteoporosis was based upon the bone density (BD) of the lumbar spine measured by quantitative computed tomography (CBD: BD > 108 mg/cm3; OPBD: BD < 70 mg/cm3). Urinary excretion of GHYL, PYD, and DPD were measured by HPLC, and all data were expressed as the molar ratio with the creatinine excretion (GHYL/CR, PYD/CR, and DPD/CR). The clinical performances were tested by: Z score analysis (Z), Receiver Operated Characteristic curve analysis (%Acc) and logistic-regression analysis of the posterior probabilities for prediction from a logistic model (LOGIST). GHYL/CR, PYD/CR, and DPD/CR were significantly increased in OPBD compared with CBD. The clinical performances were similar for the three assays, with slightly better performances for GHYL/CR (GHYL/CR: Z = 3.14, %Acc = 70 +/- 8, LOGIST P = 0.01; PYD/CR: Z = 2.19, %Acc = 67 +/- 8, LOGIST P = 0.051; DPD/CR: Z = 2.13, %Acc = 65 +/- 8, LOGIST P = 0.06). None of the possible combinations of the three assays yielded better clinical performances than GHYL/CR alone. In conclusion, this study further confirms the validity of GHYL, PYD, and DPD as markers of bone resorption.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. Libanati, D. J. Baylink, E. Lois-Wenzel, N. Srinivasan, and S. Mohan
Studies on the Potential Mediators of Skeletal Changes Occurring during Puberty in Girls
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 1999; 84(8): 2807 - 2814.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
N. B. Watts
Clinical Utility of Biochemical Markers of Bone Remodeling
Clin. Chem., August 1, 1999; 45(8): 1359 - 1368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
T. G. Rosano, R. T. Peaston, H. G. Bone, H. W. Woitge, R. M. Francis, and M. J. Seibel
Urinary free deoxypyridinoline by chemiluminescence immunoassay: analytical and clinical evaluation
Clin. Chem., October 1, 1998; 44(10): 2126 - 2132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
P. Bettica, M. Bevilacqua, T. Vago, M. Masino, E. Cucinotta, and G. Norbiato
Short-Term Variations in Bone Remodeling Biochemical Markers: Cyclical Etidronate and Alendronate Effects Compared
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 1997; 82(9): 3034 - 3039.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1996 by The Endocrine Society