help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cagnacci, A.
Right arrow Articles by Melis, G. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cagnacci, A.
Right arrow Articles by Melis, G. B.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 80, 860-863, Copyright © 1995 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Prolonged opioid blockade does not influence luteinizing hormone modifications of the follicular and luteal menstrual phases

A Cagnacci, AM Paoletti, R Soldani, F Tuveri and GB Melis
Istituto di Ginecologia Ostetricia e Fisiopatologia della Riproduzione Umana, University of Cagliari, Italy.

Although an acute opioid withdrawal markedly modifies LH secretion in the different phases of the menstrual cycle, whether a sustained opioid blockade imbalances spontaneous LH modifications associated with the progression of the follicular or luteal menstrual phases is presently unknown. Accordingly, normal cycling women during either the follicular (n = 14) or luteal (n = 14) menstrual phase, randomly and in double blind fashion, received either placebo (n = 7 for each phase) or 50 mg/day of the oral opioid antagonist naltrexone (n = 7 for each phase). In each subject, LH pulsatility (10-min blood drawing for 8 h) and the pituitary LH response to a 10-micrograms GnRH stimulus were investigated at baseline and on the fifth day of placebo/naltrexone administration. In the follicular phase, after placebo treatment, the number and amplitude of LH pulses did not significantly vary, whereas mean LH levels (P < 0.01) and the LH response to GnRH (P < 0.05) were significantly increased. The same occurred after naltrexone treatment, when significant increases in both mean LH levels (P < 0.02) and LH response to GnRH (P < 0.025) were observed. In the luteal phase, after placebo administration, the frequency of LH pulses and mean LH levels were not modified, but both the amplitude of LH pulses (P < 0.025) and the LH response to GnRH were reduced (P < 0.02). The same occurred after naltrexone treatment, when significant decreases in both the amplitude of LH pulses (P < 0.05) and the LH response to GnRH (P < 0.05) were observed. During both phases of the menstrual cycle, the modifications observed during naltrexone treatment were similar and not significantly different from those observed during placebo. The present data do not support important modulatory functions for endogenous opioid peptides on spontaneous LH modifications occurring with the progression of the follicular or the luteal menstrual phases.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1995 by The Endocrine Society