help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bell, W.
Right arrow Articles by Scanlon, M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bell, W.
Right arrow Articles by Scanlon, M. F.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 80, 630-636, Copyright © 1995 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

The validity of estimating total body fat and fat-free mass from skinfold thickness in adults with growth hormone deficiency

W Bell, JS Davies, WD Evans and MF Scanlon
Cardiff Institute of Education, Cyncoed, Wales.

The regression equations of Durnin and Womersley for estimating total body fat (TBF) and fat-free mass (FFM) from skinfold thickness were validated for adult GH-deficient (GHD) patients by comparing the values of TBF and FFM from the prediction equations with the directly measured values from dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Twenty-seven male and 24 female patients (aged 21-61 yr) were studied. GHD was isolated in 5 cases and was part of a spectrum of hypopituitarism due to a variety of causes in 46 cases. The mean period of GHD was 6.9 +/- 4.6 yr. All patients were receiving stable replacement therapy. The validation statistics showed no significant differences (P > 0.05) between measured and predicted values of TBF and FFM in either males (24.5 vs. 24.9 and 65.5 vs. 65.8 kg) or females (24.6 vs. 26.3 and 44.7 vs. 43.9 kg). Mean differences were smaller in males (0.4 and 0.2 kg) than females (1.7 and -0.8 kg); they were less than 1% in males and less than 2% in females. Therefore, the Durnin and Womersley equations are suitable for general use with GHD patients. Using TBF (kilograms) from dual energy x-ray absorptiometry as the dependent variable and the log of the sum of skinfold thickness as the independent variable, linear regression equations were formulated to predict TBF in GHD patients. The lowest SE of estimate was 3.8 kg in males and 4.6 kg in females. To determine their general applicability, these equations will need to be cross-validated.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1995 by The Endocrine Society