help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vizoso, F.
Right arrow Articles by Lopez-Otin, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vizoso, F.
Right arrow Articles by Lopez-Otin, C.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 79, 525-529, Copyright © 1994 by Endocrine Society

ARTICLES

Relationship between serum prolactin levels and protein composition of breast secretions in nonlactating women

F Vizoso, I Diez-Itza, LM Sanchez, AF Tuya, A Ruibal and C Lopez-Otin
Servicio de Cirugia, Hospital de Jove, Oviedo, Spain.

The potential relationship between serum PRL levels and protein composition of breast secretions was evaluated in 54 premenopausal nonlactating women during the luteal phase of their menstrual cycle. Women were classified into four groups according to the presence or absence of breast pathology and to the protein pattern of their breast secretions. Type I mammary fluids contain Zn-alpha 2-glycoprotein, apolipoprotein D, and gross cystic disease fluid protein-15, whereas Type II fluids are characterized by the presence of some milk proteins such as lactoferrin, lysozyme, and alpha-lactalbumin. Basal serum levels of PRL, as well as of progesterone, LH, FSH, TSH, T3, and T4 were within normal range, and no significant differences were found between the different groups of women under study. However, after a TRH stimulation test, the maximum PRL response was significantly higher (P < 0.02) in normal women with Type II secretions than in those with Type I (64 +/- 6.8 micrograms/L vs. 43.7 +/- 3.9 micrograms/L). Similarly, when PRL concentrations in patients with benign breast disease were considered, those with breast fluids containing milk proteins had a rise in PRL secretion after TRH stimulation significantly higher (P < 0.05) than those with fluids lacking these proteins (77.1 +/- 6.2 vs. 58.8 +/- 5.1 micrograms/L). These results indicate that the occurrence of milk proteins in breast secretions from nonlactating women is associated with an increase in serum PRL concentrations after TRH stimulation, and opens the possibility of using breast fluid protein analysis as a simple and noninvasive procedure for studies on the putative role of PRL in the development of benign and malignant breast diseases.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1994 by The Endocrine Society