help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Flogstad, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Jervell, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Flogstad, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Jervell, J.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 79, 461-465, Copyright © 1994 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

A comparison of octreotide, bromocriptine, or a combination of both drugs in acromegaly

AK Flogstad, J Halse, P Grass, E Abisch, O Djoseland, K Kutz, E Bodd and J Jervell
Medical Department B, Rikshospitalet, National Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

We investigated the pharmacokinetics of bromocriptine and octreotide, both individually and in combination, in 12 patients with active acromegaly. The pharmacodynamics of the drugs were assessed by 12-h profiles of GH secretion and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) measurements. During the 42-day study period, bromocriptine was administered for 28 days (from day 8; 5 mg, orally, twice daily) and octreotide (200 micrograms, sc, twice daily) from days 15-42. IGF-I levels, 12-h GH, and plasma bromocriptine and octreotide profiles were obtained on days 0, 14, 28, and 42. During bromocriptine treatment, both the area under the GH day curves (AUC) and mean IGF-I decreased to 64% (95% confidence limits, 43-72% and 48-82%, respectively) of initial values. During octreotide treatment, the respective values were 23% (18- 30%) and 32% (21-36%), which were greater decreases than those during bromocriptine treatment [36% (95% confidence limits, 32-54%) for AUC for GH and 50% (95% confidence limits, 34-58%) for IGF-I]. With combined treatment, the AUC for GH was reduced to 16% (12-21%) and that of IGF-I to 25% (16-27%) of initial values. This combination was more effective than bromocriptine [25% (95% confidence limits, 22-37%) for AUC for GH and 39% (95% confidence limits, 25-43%) for IGF-I] and octreotide alone [78% (95% confidence limits, 53-89%) for AUC for GH and 78% (95% confidence limits, 57-98%) for IGF-I]. The pharmacokinetic parameters of octreotide were unchanged by the coadministration of bromocriptine. The bioavailability of bromocriptine increased by approximately 40% when bromocriptine was administered together with octreotide compared with administration alone (P < 0.01). Bromocriptine disposition parameters were unaltered. In conclusion, treatment of acromegalics with a combination of octreotide and bromocriptine increases the bioavailability of bromocriptine and reduces both GH and IGF-I levels more effectively than treatment with either drug alone. This presents the possibility of less frequent drug administrations, lower doses of octreotide, and, consequently, lower treatment costs.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
D. Ferone, F. Gatto, M. Arvigo, E. Resmini, M. Boschetti, C. Teti, D. Esposito, and F. Minuto
The clinical-molecular interface of somatostatin, dopamine and their receptors in pituitary pathophysiology
J. Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2009; 42(5): 361 - 370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
T. Miyoshi, F. Otsuka, H. Otani, K. Inagaki, J. Goto, M. Yamashita, T. Ogura, Y. Iwasaki, and H. Makino
Involvement of bone morphogenetic protein-4 in GH regulation by octreotide and bromocriptine in rat pituitary GH3 cells
J. Endocrinol., April 1, 2008; 197(1): 159 - 169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
A. Colao, M. Filippella, R. Pivonello, C. Di Somma, A. Faggiano, and G. Lombardi
Combined therapy of somatostatin analogues and dopamine agonists in the treatment of pituitary tumours
Eur. J. Endocrinol., April 1, 2007; 156(suppl_1): S57 - S63.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
D. Ferone, M. Arvigo, C. Semino, P. Jaquet, A. Saveanu, J. E. Taylor, J.-P. Moreau, M. D. Culler, M. Albertelli, F. Minuto, et al.
Somatostatin and dopamine receptor expression in lung carcinoma cells and effects of chimeric somatostatin-dopamine molecules on cell proliferation
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, December 1, 2005; 289(6): E1044 - E1050.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S.-G. Ren, S. Kim, J. Taylor, J. Dong, J.-P. Moreau, M. D. Culler, and S. Melmed
Suppression of Rat and Human Growth Hormone and Prolactin Secretion by a Novel Somatostatin/Dopaminergic Chimeric Ligand
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2003; 88(11): 5414 - 5421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Saveanu, E. Lavaque, G. Gunz, A. Barlier, S. Kim, J. E. Taylor, M. D. Culler, A. Enjalbert, and P. Jaquet
Demonstration of Enhanced Potency of a Chimeric Somatostatin-Dopamine Molecule, BIM-23A387, in Suppressing Growth Hormone and Prolactin Secretion from Human Pituitary Somatotroph Adenoma Cells
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2002; 87(12): 5545 - 5552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
P. U. Freda
Somatostatin Analogs in Acromegaly
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2002; 87(7): 3013 - 3018.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
P. U. Freda and S. L. Wardlaw
Diagnosis and Treatment of Pituitary Tumors
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 1999; 84(11): 3859 - 3866.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Melmed, I. Jackson, D. Kleinberg, and A. Klibanski
Current Treatment Guidelines for Acromegaly
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 1998; 83(8): 2646 - 2652.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Colao, B. Merola, D. Ferone, and G. Lombardi
Acromegaly
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 1997; 82(9): 2777 - 2781.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Colao, D. Ferone, P. Marzullo, A. Di Sarno, G. Cerbone, F. Sarnacchiaro, S. Cirillo, B. Merola, and G. Lombardi
Effect of Different Dopaminergic Agents in the Treatment of Acromegaly
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 1997; 82(2): 518 - 523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. K. Flogstad, J. Halse, S. Bakke, I. Lancranjan, P. Marbach, Ch. Bruns, and J. Jervell
Sandostatin LAR in Acromegalic Patients: Long Term Treatment
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 1997; 82(1): 23 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1994 by The Endocrine Society