help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baumann, G.
Right arrow Articles by Wells, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baumann, G.
Right arrow Articles by Wells, J. A.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 78, 1113-1118, Copyright © 1994 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

The stoichiometry of growth hormone-binding protein complexes in human plasma: comparison with cell surface receptors

G Baumann, HB Lowman, M Mercado and JA Wells
Department of Protein Engineering, Genetech, Inc. South San Francisco, California 94080.

The recent demonstration of two independent receptor-binding sites (sites 1 and 2) on human GH (hGH) raises the question of the stoichiometry of circulating GH-binding protein (GH-BP) complexes in human plasma (i.e. is it one hGH per one GHBP or one hGH per two GHBPs?). Previous studies have all assumed 1:1 binding in plasma, based on gel exclusion chromatography and cross-linking data. To address this issue, human plasma was incubated with radioiodinated hGH as well as hGH mutants that had either a Tyr103-->Ala or a Gly120-->Arg substitution in the region of binding site 2. The former mutant retains normal site 2 binding activity even when iodinated; the latter has binding site 2 inactivated. Bound and free hGH were then separated on a Sephadex G-100 column according to a standard protocol for measuring GHBP. In all three cases, more than 90% of the high affinity GH-BP complex eluting from the column was consistent with 1:1 binding. Similar results were obtained when a physiological amount of recombinant or purified natural GHBP was substituted for plasma. However, at supraphysiological concentrations of GHBP, an additional component corresponding to the 2:1 complex eluted from the column; the relative proportions of the 2:1 and 1:1 complexes were dependent on the GHBP concentration. These data suggest that at physiological GHBP levels in plasma, the 1:1 complex predominates, and that small amounts of the 2:1 complex may be difficult to detect because of partial peak overlap with the 1:1 complex, dissociation, and, in whole plasma, coelution with the low affinity GHBP complex. Calculation of the theoretical partition of hGH between 1:1 and 2:1 complexes indicated that at concentrations of GHBP prevailing in plasma (approximately 1 nmol/L), the 1:1 complex predominates, but that at the high receptor concentrations prevailing at the cell surface (60 nmol/L to 6.7 mumol/L, depending on the cell type), virtually all hGH is captured in a 2:1 complex. These findings are consistent with the present and previous experimental data on the size of the circulating high affinity GH-BP complex, as well as with those indicating the importance of GH- induced receptor dimerization for GH action. A functional consequence of the large concentration difference between GHBP in plasma and GH receptors at the cell surface is that the circulating GHBP can serve as a dynamic buffer, modulating bound and free GH and prolonging its half- life, whereas the receptor acts as a dominant force in unidirectional capture of GH.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
J. Fuglsang, P. Sandager, N. Moller, S. Fisker, H. Orskov, and P. Ovesen
Kinetics and secretion of placental growth hormone around parturition.
Eur. J. Endocrinol., March 1, 2006; 154(3): 449 - 457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. J. M. Ross, K. C. Leung, M. Maamra, W. Bennett, N. Doyle, M. J. Waters, and K. K. Y. Ho
Binding and Functional Studies with the Growth Hormone Receptor Antagonist, B2036-PEG (Pegvisomant), Reveal Effects of Pegylation and Evidence That It Binds to a Receptor Dimer
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2001; 86(4): 1716 - 1723.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
G. P. Frick, L.-R. Tai, W. R. Baumbach, and H. M. Goodman
Tissue Distribution, Turnover, and Glycosylation of the Long and Short Growth Hormone Receptor Isoforms in Rat Tissues
Endocrinology, June 1, 1998; 139(6): 2824 - 2830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
M. Wada, H. Uchida, M. Ikeda, B. Tsunekawa, N. Naito, S. Banba, E. Tanaka, Y. Hashimoto, and M. Honjo
The 20-Kilodalton (kDa) Human Growth Hormone (hGH) Differs from the 22-kDa hGH in the Complex Formation with Cell Surface hGH Receptor and hGH-Binding Protein Circulating in Human Plasma
Mol. Endocrinol., January 1, 1998; 12(1): 146 - 156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. Tzanela, C. Wagner, and G. Shaffer Tannenbaum
Recombinant Human Growth Hormone-Binding Protein Fails to Enhance the in Vivo Bioactivity of Human Growth Hormone in Normal Rats
Endocrinology, December 1, 1997; 138(12): 5316 - 5324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Di Marco, I. Gloaguen, A. Demartis, I. Saggio, R. Graziani, G. Paonessa, and R. Laufer
Agonistic and Antagonistic Variants of Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor (CNTF) Reveal Functional Differences between Membrane-bound and Soluble CNTF alpha -Receptor
J. Biol. Chem., September 12, 1997; 272(37): 23069 - 23075.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Sundstrom, T. Lundqvist, J. Rodin, LutzB. Giebel, D. Milligan, and G. Norstedt
Crystal Structure of an Antagonist Mutant of Human Growth Hormone, G120R, in Complex with Its Receptor at 2.9AResolution
J. Biol. Chem., December 13, 1996; 271(50): 32197 - 32203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Pennica, K. J. Shaw, T. A. Swanson, M. W. Moore, D. L. Shelton, K. A. Zioncheck, A. Rosenthal, T. Taga, N. F. Paoni, and W. I. Wood
Cardiotrophin-1
J. Biol. Chem., May 5, 1995; 270(18): 10915 - 10922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1994 by The Endocrine Society