help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Villiger, L.
Right arrow Articles by Jaeger, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Villiger, L.
Right arrow Articles by Jaeger, P.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 76, 890-894, Copyright © 1993 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Diltiazem stimulates parathyroid hormone secretion in vivo whereas felodipine does not

L Villiger, JP Casez, R Takkinen and P Jaeger
Policlinic of Medicine, University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.

The impact of two calcium channel blockers of different structure, diltiazem and felodipine, on PTH secretion was studied under hyper- and hypocalcemic conditions. Six healthy volunteers were investigated before and after treatment with felodipine, then after treatment with diltiazem. Under each of these three conditions, they received first a calcium infusion (0.109 mmol/kg over 130 min). Blood was drawn every 5- 10 min for measurements of Ca2+ and intact PTH concentrations, and urine was collected over the infusion periods for measurements of calcium and creatinine. Basal levels of Ca2+ and intact PTH concentrations were similar under the three conditions. During calcium infusion, Ca2+ increased linearly from 1.27 to 1.51 mmol/L during the control period. Based on the whole response curve, Ca2+/time, this rise was less marked (P < 0.002) during each of the calcium channel blocker periods than under control conditions, although the three values of urinary calcium excretion were similar. In addition, PTH secretion was less suppressed on diltiazem than on felodipine therapy or during the control period (P < 0.04). During EDTA infusion, Ca2+ decreased in a linear way from 1.27 to 1.07 mmol/L during the control period. Based on the whole response curve, Ca2+/time, this decrease was more marked during felodipine than during diltiazem treatment or in the control period (P < 0.001). Although Ca2+ concentrations did not differ between the control and diltiazem periods, PTH levels were 1.3-fold higher (P < 0.0001) during diltiazem, but similar in the control and felodipine periods. These data demonstrate that diltiazem, but not felodipine, stimulates PTH secretion in vivo in man, with a maximal effect observed under hypocalcemic conditions.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1993 by The Endocrine Society