help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blethen, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Johanson, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blethen, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Johanson, A.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 76, 574-579, Copyright © 1993 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Factors predicting the response to growth hormone (GH) therapy in prepubertal children with GH deficiency

SL Blethen, P Compton, BM Lippe, RG Rosenfeld, GP August and A Johanson
Department of Pediatrics, State University of New York, Stony Brook 11794.

To identify factors influencing the response to GH therapy, we used a multiple regression model to analyze data from 632 naive prepubertal children with GH deficiency (GHD). There were 523 children with idiopathic and 109 children with organic GHD. They were treated with the same preparation of biosynthetic methionyl GH (somatrem, Protropin) for at least 1 yr. In children with idiopathic GHD, six variables predicted 40% of the response to treatment. They were (listed in relative importance, all P < 0.0001): age, log maximum GH, weight adjusted for height, dosing schedule, dose, and midparental height. Three variables, pretreatment growth rate, log maximum GH, and age, predicted 20% of the GH response in children with organic GHD. When data for all children were analyzed using analysis of covariance, children with idiopathic GHD grew better than those with organic GHD (mean +/- SD, 9.2 +/- 2.4 vs. 8.8 +/- 2.6 cm/yr; P < 0.0001). The children (both organic and idiopathic GHD) who did not respond well to treatment were younger and thinner than those who did. Early diagnosis and initiation of therapy should be beneficial to ultimate height attainment. The best response to GH therapy should be in young children with severe idiopathic GHD who receive daily weight-adjusted doses. The use of GH daily in higher doses would be expected to be most beneficial in older children with acquired and/or less severe GHD or in children who are underweight for height.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1993 by The Endocrine Society