help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ho, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Rajkovic, I. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ho, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Rajkovic, I. A.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*ESTRADIOL

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 76, 302-308, Copyright © 1993 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Regulation of growth hormone binding protein in man: comparison of gel chromatography and immunoprecipitation methods

KK Ho, E Valiontis, MJ Waters and IA Rajkovic
Garvan Institute of Medical Research, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

GH circulates in part bound to a high affinity binding protein (GHBP). Gel chromatography is the established method for measuring GH binding activity in plasma, but is slow and tedious. The separation of bound from free GH by immunoprecipitation using a monoclonal antibody to the GH receptor may be a more practical alternative. We have examined the effects of GH and estrogen status on GHBP measured in 24-h pool samples and compared results obtained from gel filtration and immunoprecipitation. GHBP activity (percent specific binding of [125I]GH) was measured in normal, GH-deficient, and acromegalic subjects; and in two groups of postmenopausal women before and after oral (ethinyl estradiol 20 micrograms daily) or transdermal (17 beta- estradiol 100 micrograms daily) estrogen therapy. GHBP activity was not significantly different between normal, GH-deficient, and acromegalic subjects matched for age and sex. Neither GH administration to GH- deficient and normal subjects, nor octreotide treatment of patients with acromegaly, significantly altered GHBP activity. Oral estrogen treatment significantly increased GHBP activity. This change was associated with an increase in binding capacity (P = 0.001) but not affinity, as revealed by Scatchard analysis. GHBP activity did not change significantly with transdermal estrogen therapy. GHBP activity obtained by the two methods was significantly correlated (n = 70, r = 0.92, P = 0.001) although values for the antibody method were 25% higher. Similarly, capacity estimates were highly correlated (r = 0.90, P = 0.0001), with values by immunoprecipitation being 40% higher. We conclude that GH secretory status is not a determinant of GHBP. Oral estrogens increase GHBP activity through an increase in capacity and not affinity. The estrogen effect is route dependent and the oral response is likely to reflect a first pass hepatic effect. The higher binding activity and capacity estimated from immunoprecipitation are likely to reflect a more rapid separation process thereby minimizing dissociation of GHBP complex. Immunoprecipitation offers the advantages of simplicity, convenience, and accuracy for the measurement of GH binding activity and GHBP concentrations in serum.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
K.-C. Leung, G. Johannsson, G. M. Leong, and K. K. Y. Ho
Estrogen Regulation of Growth Hormone Action
Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2004; 25(5): 693 - 721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. J. M. Ross, K. C. Leung, M. Maamra, W. Bennett, N. Doyle, M. J. Waters, and K. K. Y. Ho
Binding and Functional Studies with the Growth Hormone Receptor Antagonist, B2036-PEG (Pegvisomant), Reveal Effects of Pegylation and Evidence That It Binds to a Receptor Dimer
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2001; 86(4): 1716 - 1723.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K.-C. Leung, M. J. Waters, I. Markus, W. R. Baumbach, and K. K. Y. Ho
Insulin and insulin-like growth factor-I acutely inhibit surface translocation of growth hormone receptors in osteoblasts: A novel mechanism of growth hormone receptor regulation
PNAS, October 14, 1997; 94(21): 11381 - 11386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1993 by The Endocrine Society