| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 75, 393-398, Copyright © 1992 by Endocrine Society
ARTICLES |
HM Behre, B Klein, E Steinmeyer, GP McGregor, K Voigt and E Nieschlag
Institute of Reproductive Medicine, The University, Munster, Germany.
In rats and nonhuman primates the new GnRH antagonist cetrorelix (SB- 75; [Ac-D-Nal(2)1,D-Phe(4Cl)2,D-Pal(3)3,D-Cit6,D-Ala10]GnR H) has been shown to suppress testosterone secretion effectively and persistently. A clinical phase I study was performed to assess the hormonal effects of this highly potent antagonist in normal men. After 2 control examinations 30 young male volunteers were randomly assigned to 6 treatment groups (n = 5/group), and single doses of 0 (placebo), 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 5.0 mg cetrorelix were administered sc. Blood samples were obtained over the course of 7 days postinjection. After maximal cetrorelix serum levels were achieved 1 h postinjection, the GnRH antagonist serum levels decreased with a terminal t1/2 of 29.8 +/- 4.2 h (mean +/- SE). LH secretion was suppressed dose- and time- dependently; maximal suppression occurred 4-6 h postinjection. Suppression of FSH did not reach statistical significance. Doses of 1.0, 2.0, and 5.0 mg cetrorelix significantly suppressed testosterone secretion compared to that in the placebo group. After the administration of 1.0 mg cetrorelix, maximal suppression was seen 8 h after injection, with testosterone levels of 7.5 +/- 1.1 nmol/L compared to 15.8 +/- 2.2 nmol/L in the placebo group. Maximal testosterone suppression by 2.0 and 5.0 mg cetrorelix occurred 12 h after injection, with testosterone concentrations of 4.9 +/- 0.5 and 2.2 +/- 0.4 nmol/L, respectively, compared to 16.5 +/- 1.7 nmol/L in the placebo group. Twenty-four hours after the injection of 1.0 and 2.0 mg cetrorelix, testosterone values were no longer significantly different from those in the placebo group, whereas in the 5.0-mg dose group testosterone concentrations increased slightly and reached serum concentrations in the lower normal range after 48 h. The only side- effect observed after the administration of cetrorelix was a transient local erythema at the injection site that disappeared within 30 min. No local induration or pruritus, or any adverse systemic side-effect occurred in any volunteer. In conclusion, the new GnRH antagonist cetrorelix effectively decreases serum LH and testosterone concentrations in a dose- and time-dependent manner and, therefore, has potential for treatment of sex hormone-dependent diseases and male contraception.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. F. Vlahos, C. W. Lipari, B. Bankowski, T.-H. Lai, J. A. King, I.-M. Shih, K. Fragakis, and Y. Zhao Effect of Luteal-Phase Support on Endometrial L-Selectin Ligand Expression after Recombinant Follicle-Stimulating Hormone and Ganirelix Acetate for in Vitro Fertilization J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2006; 91(10): 4043 - 4049. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Matthiesson and R. I. McLachlan Male hormonal contraception: concept proven, product in sight? Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2006; 12(4): 463 - 482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Matthiesson, P. G. Stanton, L. O'Donnell, S. J. Meachem, J. K. Amory, R. Berger, W. J. Bremner, and R. I. McLachlan Effects of Testosterone and Levonorgestrel Combined with a 5{alpha}-Reductase Inhibitor or Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist on Spermatogenesis and Intratesticular Steroid Levels in Normal Men J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2005; 90(10): 5647 - 5655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Herbst, A. D. Coviello, S. Page, J. K. Amory, B. D. Anawalt, and W. J. Bremner A Single Dose of the Potent Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist Acyline Suppresses Gonadotropins and Testosterone for 2 Weeks in Healthy Young Men J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2004; 89(12): 5959 - 5965. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kamischke, H. Jurgens, L. Hertle, W. E. Berdel, and E. Nieschlag Cryopreservation of Sperm From Adolescents and Adults With Malignancies J Androl, July 1, 2004; 25(4): 586 - 592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. I. McLachlan, D. M. Robertson, E. Pruysers, A. Ugoni, A. M. Matsumoto, B. D. Anawalt, W. J. Bremner, and C. Meriggiola Relationship between Serum Gonadotropins and Spermatogenic Suppression in Men Undergoing Steroidal Contraceptive Treatment J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2004; 89(1): 142 - 149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kamischke, A. Baumgardt, J. Horst, and E. Nieschlag Clinical and Diagnostic Features of Patients With Suspected Klinefelter Syndrome J Androl, January 1, 2003; 24(1): 41 - 48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Swerdloff, C. J. Bagatell, C. Wang, B. D. Anawalt, N. Berman, B. Steiner, and W. J. Bremner Suppression of Spermatogenesis in Man Induced by Nal-Glu Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Antagonist and Testosterone Enanthate (TE) Is Maintained by TE Alone J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 1998; 83(10): 3527 - 3533. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. von Eckardstein, S. Kliesch, E. Nieschlag, A. Chirazi, G. Assmann, and H. M. Behre Suppression of Endogenous Testosterone in Young Men Increases Serum Levels of High Density Lipoprotein Subclass Lipoprotein A-I and Lipoprotein(a) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 1997; 82(10): 3367 - 3372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. M. Behre, S. Kliesch, G. Puhse, T. Reissmann, and E. Nieschlag High Loading and Low Maintenance Doses of a Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist Effectively Suppress Serum Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle-Stimulating Hormone, and Testosterone in Normal Men J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 1997; 82(5): 1403 - 1408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. F. Minto, C. Howe, S. Wishart, A. J. Conway, and D. J. Handelsman Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Nandrolone Esters in Oil Vehicle: Effects of Ester, Injection Site and Injection Volume J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 1997; 281(1): 93 - 102. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. Gordon, R. T. Scott, R. F. Williams, D. R. Danforth, H. J. J. Loozen, H. J. Kloosterboer, and G. D. Hodgen In Vivo Effects of a Potent GnRH Antagonist ORG 30850: Physiologic Evidence That Down-Regulation of GnRH Receptors Does Not Occur Reproductive Sciences, October 1, 1994; 1(4): 290 - 296. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |