help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Attvall, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lager, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Attvall, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lager, I.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 74, 1110-1115, Copyright © 1992 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Insulin-antagonistic effects of pulsatile and continuous glucagon infusions in man--a comparison with the effect of adrenaline

S Attvall, J Fowelin, H von Schenck, U Smith and I Lager
Department of Medicine II, University of Goteborg, Sahlgren's Hospital, Sweden.

The insulin-antagonistic effects of pulsatile (3 min pulses every 20 min) and continuous glucagon infusions were studied over 4 h with the euglycemic clamp technique in healthy subjects. Comparisons were made to the effect of a continuous adrenaline infusion. Glucose production and utilization were evaluated with D-3-3H-glucose and somatostatin was used in all studies to inhibit the endogenous release of insulin and glucagon. The amount of glucagon given during the pulsatile infusions (27% of that during continuous infusion) was adjusted so that the peak glucagon levels were the same as during the continuous infusion (372 +/- 22 and 365 +/- 20 ng/L, respectively). The insulin-antagonistic effects of pulsatile and continuous glucagon infusions were similar during the first hour and imparied the insulin effect with 44 +/- 8 and 47 +/- 6%, respectively. However, when infused continuously, the effect of glucagon declined rapidly, whereas the effect of a pulsatile infusion decreased more slowly and was evident for 3 h. Raising the glucagon level 4-fold restored the insulin-antagonistic effect again suggesting that the cells had become desensitized. In contrast, the insulin- antagonistic effect of adrenaline was persistent throughout the 4 h of the study and impaired insulin action with 54 +/- 2%. The effects of pulsatile and continuous glucagon infusions were entirely due to the stimulation of glucose production while that of adrenaline mainly was due to inhibition of peripheral glucose uptake. In conclusion, the acute stimulatory effect of glucagon on glucose production is transient but it is better maintained when given as intermittent pulses rather than as a continuous infusion. In contrast, the insulin-antagonistic effect of adrenaline on glucose uptake is persistent for at least 4 h.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1992 by The Endocrine Society