help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kearns, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Frindik, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kearns, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Frindik, J. P.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 72, 1148-1156, Copyright © 1991 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Single and multiple dose pharmacokinetics of methionyl growth hormone in children with idiopathic growth hormone deficiency

GL Kearns, SF Kemp and JP Frindik
Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock 72205-7199.

The pharmacokinetics (PK) of methionyl GH (metGH) were characterized in 20 newly diagnosed GH-deficient children (19 males; 12.9 +/- 3.3 yr old; initial height, 138.8 +/- 16.2 cm; weight, 32.1 +/- 13.1 kg) after the first dose (FD) of metGH and again after 4-5 weeks of multiple dosing (MD). All subjects received a total metGH dose of 0.3 mg/kg.week by sc administration, but were randomized to receive the drug daily (D; n = 12; dose, 0.043 mg/kg) or three times per week (TIW; n = 8; dose, 0.1 mg/kg). After drug administration, repeated blood samples (n = 14) were obtained over a 10-h period. Concentrations of metGH from each sample were determined using a monoclonal antibody radiometric assay (range of linearity, 0.5-40.0 ng/ml; coefficient of variation, less than 4%). Plasma concentration vs. time data were curve fit using a nonlinear weighted least squares algorithm which permitted calculation of the following PK parameters (mean +/- SEM; FD vs. MD group): elimination rate constant (0.23 +/- 0.04 vs. 0.25 +/- 0.04 h-1), absorption rate constant (0.43 +/- 0.05 vs. 0.48 +/- 0.04 h-1), elimination half-life (t1/2; 3.01 vs. 2.77 h), total plasma clearance (CL/F; 0.32 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.54 +/- 0.09 L/h.kg), and apparent volume of distribution (VDss/F; 2.2 +/- 0.14 vs. 3.15 +/- 0.28 L/kg). Both the CL/F and VDss/F of metGH were significantly greater when data from the entire study population were compared on the basis of FD vs. MD administration. With the exception of a larger VDss/F in subjects who received daily (3.6 +/- 0.4 L/kg) vs. TIW metGH (2.4 +/- 0.2 L/kg), no significant differences were found for the PK parameters between the D and TIW dosing groups. In all subjects, absorption of metGH was slow, with an average time to reach maximum concentration (Tmax) of 4.4 h and an absorption t1/2 that ranged from 1.4-1.8 h. Proportionality was also found between the dose and the area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve, suggesting dose-independent PK of metGH. Our data demonstrate that the PK of metGH after sc administration to children are markedly different from those previously reported in adults and, also, do not vary as a consequence of dosing schedule (i.e. D vs. TIW). The apparent increase in CL/F and VDss/F for met GH with multiple dosing may reflect concentration-dependent changes in plasma binding of the drug or, alternatively, represent the effect of increased body mass on the pharmacokinetics of GH.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
A. Keller, Z. Wu, J. Kratzsch, E. Keller, W. F Blum, A. Kniess, R. Preiss, J. Teichert, C. J Strasburger, and M. Bidlingmaier
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of GH: dependence on route and dosage of administration
Eur. J. Endocrinol., June 1, 2007; 156(6): 647 - 653.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. F. Kemp, P. J. Fielder, K. M. Attie, S. L. Blethen, E. O. Reiter, K. M. Ford, M. Marian, L. N. Dao, H. J. Lee, and P. Saenger
Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Characteristics of a Long-Acting Growth Hormone (GH) Preparation (Nutropin Depot) in GH-Deficient Children
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2004; 89(7): 3234 - 3240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. A. Jaffe, D. K. Turgeon, K. Lown, R. Demott-Friberg, and P. B. Watkins
Growth hormone secretion pattern is an independent regulator of growth hormone actions in humans
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, November 1, 2002; 283(5): E1008 - E1015.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
P. Saenger, K. M. Attie, J. DiMartino-Nardi, R. Hintz, L. Frahm, and J. W. Frane
Metabolic Consequences of 5-Year Growth Hormone (GH) Therapy in Children Treated with GH for Idiopathic Short Stature
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 1998; 83(9): 3115 - 3120.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. Pihoker, G. L. Kearns, D. French, and C. Y. Bowers
Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Growth Hormone-Releasing Peptide-2: A Phase I Study in Children
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 1998; 83(4): 1168 - 1172.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
P. D. K. Lee, S. K. Durham, V. Martinez, O. Vasconez, D. R. Powell, and J. Guevara-Aguirre
Kinetics of Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF) and IGF-Binding Protein Responses to a Single Dose of Growth Hormone
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 1997; 82(7): 2266 - 2274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1991 by The Endocrine Society