help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bagdade, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Subbaiah, P. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bagdade, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Subbaiah, P. V.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 72, 283-286, Copyright © 1991 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Effects of estropipate treatment on plasma lipids and lipoprotein lipid composition in postmenopausal women

JD Bagdade and PV Subbaiah
Department of Medicine, Rush Medical College, Chicago, Illinois 60612.

It is generally believed that the cardioprotective benefit of long term treatment of postmenopausal women with estrogen results in part from its capacity to increase high density lipoprotein (HDL) and lower low density lipoprotein (LDL) concentrations. The extent to which the various estrogens employed in replacement treatment affect the composition of lipoproteins, however, is not known. For this reason, we have examined the impact of one such preparation, the synthetic estrone estropipate (1.25 mg/day), on lipoprotein levels and composition in six postmenopausal women. After 6 months of treatment, whole plasma triglyceride (pretreatment, 135 +/- 63; posttreatment, 143 +/- 56 mg/dL), cholesterol (pretreatment, 232 +/- 14; posttreatment, 216 +/- 29 mg/dL), and HDL-C (pretreatment, 57.8 +/- 14.8; posttreatment, 55.6 +/- 13.2) were unchanged. However, plasma free (unesterified) cholesterol (FC) fell (pretreatment, 73.4 +/- 6.2; posttreatment, 53.7 +/- 9.3 mg/dL; P less than 0.05) and lecithin (L) rose significantly (pretreatment, 2.12 +/- 0.29; posttreatment, 2.47 +/- 0.34 mumol/mL; P less than 0.01). The consequence of these changes was a significant decline in the plasma FC/L ratio (pretreatment, 0.91 +/- 0.17; posttreatment, 0.68 +/- 0.12; P less than 0.01) to levels observed in healthy menstruating women. The calculated lipoprotein particle size was unchanged in very low density lipoproteins and increased significantly (P less than 0.05) in LDL after estropipate therapy. Since qualitatively altered lipoproteins enriched in FC and an increased FC/L ratio in plasma are both associated with increased coronary risk, the improvement noted in these parameters after estropipate therapy indicates that its use may be beneficial despite the lack of change in whole plasma lipids.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1991 by The Endocrine Society