help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Allolio, B.
Right arrow Articles by Schulte, H. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Allolio, B.
Right arrow Articles by Schulte, H. M.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 71, 1195-1201, Copyright © 1990 by Endocrine Society

ARTICLES

A multihormonal response to corticotropin-releasing hormone in inferior petrosal sinus blood of patients with Cushing's disease

B Allolio, RW Gunther, G Benker, D Reinwein, W Winkelmann and HM Schulte
Medizinische Klinik II, Universitat zu Koln, Germany.

Bilateral, selective, and simultaneous catheterization of the inferior petrosal sinus is not only a valuable tool in the differential diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome, but may also provide new insights into paracrine interactions at the pituitary level. We have investigated whether CRH (1 microgram/kg BW) has any effect on the release of PRL, GH, TSH, or the alpha-subunit of hCG during this procedure. Sixteen patients under evaluation for Cushing's syndrome (Cushing's disease, n = 12; ectopic ACTH syndrome, n = 2; glucocorticoid resistance, n = 1; hormonally inactive adenoma, n = 1) were catheterized. Two of the patients with Cushing's disease received 4.0 mg naloxone iv 15 min before stimulation with CRH. Patients with Cushing's disease demonstrated a central/peripheral gradient and an intersinus gradient not only for ACTH, but also for PRL, alpha-subunit, GH, and TSH, provided that the latter two hormones were not completely suppressed by the glucocorticoid excess. Moreover, all hormones increased in response to CRH on the side with the highest ACTH concentration; PRL rose from 31.2 +/- 6.4 to 61.6 +/- 12.4 micrograms/L (P less than 0.01), and alpha-subunit from 2.6 +/- 0.6 to 6.4 +/- 1.7 micrograms/L, (P less than 0.01). Naloxone was unable to abolish the PRL or alpha-subunit increase in response to CRH. A multihormonal response to CRH in inferior petrosal sinus blood was also observed in the patient with glucocorticoid resistance and in the patient with the hormonally inactive tumor, but not in the patients with ectopic ACTH secretion. The multihormonal response to CRH could be explained by cosecretion of other hormones together with ACTH from corticotroph adenoma, by an effect of CRH on pituitary blood flow, or by a paracrine action of pituitary corticotrophs on adjacent normal pituitary cells. Our results do not support the concept that such a paracrine action is mediated by beta-endorphin. However, a higher dose of naloxone may be required to antagonize the action of pituitary beta-endorphin.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1990 by The Endocrine Society