help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rupich, R.
Right arrow Articles by Avioli, L. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rupich, R.
Right arrow Articles by Avioli, L. V.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 70, 1768-1770, Copyright © 1990 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Lateral dual energy radiography: a new method for measuring vertebral bone density: a preliminary study

R Rupich, R Pacifici, M Griffin, I Vered, N Susman and LV Avioli
Division of Endocrinology, Jewish Hospital of St. Louis, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

Dual energy radiography (DER) is a new technique for non-invasive measurement of vertebral bone mineral density, which because of its high precision (1%), is particularly suitable for prospective analyses of time-related changes in bone mass. However, we recently found that DER is less sensitive to demineralization of trabecular bone than quantitative computed tomography (QCT). Since the compact bone of the posterior vertebral elements are included in the standard anterior- posterior DER (APDER), but not in QCT measurements, changes in trabecular bone mass attending the early phases of the osteoporotic process go undetected with the APDER technique due to the preponderance of cortical mass. Lateral-view DER (LDER), however, would minimize the contribution of vertebral compact bone as well as intra-abdominal calcifications to the trabecular component. To determine the in vivo short-term precision of the LDER method, we obtained three measurements in 18 healthy women, aged 23 to 76, during a four-week period. In addition, both APDER and LDER measurements were obtained in 53 healthy women, aged 23 to 80. The coefficient of variation for LDER was 2.8%. LDER density values accounted for a higher percentage of the variance of bone mass measurements with age (47%) than APDER (23%). Moreover, LDER declined significantly with age in both premenopausal (r = -0.42, p less than 0.05) and post-menopausal women (r = -0.50, p less than 0.005), whereas the age-related changes in APDER values failed to reach statistical significance in either group. The rate of bone loss with age in the premenopausal group was 0.45% per year with LDER, and 0.10% per year with APDER. Postmenopausal women showed a 0.78% loss of bone mass per year with LDER and 0.47% per year with APDER. The correlation between APDER and LDER was significant (r = 0.78, p less than 0.01). The accumulated data indicate that LDER may be a more appropriate technique than APDER for detecting the initial loss of vertebral trabecular bone that characterizes early subclinical osteoporotic syndrome.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1990 by The Endocrine Society