help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ilondo, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Eggermont, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ilondo, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Eggermont, E.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 70, 1445-1451, Copyright © 1990 by Endocrine Society

ARTICLES

Serum growth hormone levels measured by radioimmunoassay and radioreceptor assay: a useful diagnostic tool in children with growth disorders?

MM Ilondo, M Vanderschueren-Lodeweyckx, P De Meyts and E Eggermont
Department of Pediatrics, University of Leuven, Brussels, Belgium.

Serum GH levels were measured by RIA and RRA in 133 subjects (19 healthy controls and 114 patients with various growth disturbances, aged 2.3-24.8 yr). Serum samples obtained from 147 stimulation tests representing a total of 1065 samples were analyzed by both methods, and the results compared. The data are expressed in absolute values and in RRA/RIA ratios. The area under the curve after a stimulation test (area GH) was calculated by planimetry. RIA was performed by the classical double antibody method using a polyclonal anti-serum. For the RRA, human cultured lymphocytes (IM-9 cells) were used, and 125I-labeled human GH was purified by high performance liquid chromatography. The same human GH standard was used in both assay systems. In control subjects a significant (P less than 0.0001) positive correlation was found at all ages between GH levels measured by RIA and RRA (r = 0.69 after insulin and r = 0.77 after glucagon). The RRA/RIA ratio (mean +/- SEM) for the peak GH level was 0.88 +/- 0.05, and the area under the GH curve was 0.85 +/- 0.05. The peak mean RRA/RIA ratios were significantly lower (P less than 0.05 and P = 0.03, respectively). No relationship was found with the absolute value of either peak or area GH. In patients with growth delay and Turner's syndrome, lower GH levels were found than in control subjects in both assay systems. The RRA/RIA ratios were also lower. In the other patients with some growth disorder, normal GH levels and ratios were found. In patients with renal failure, high levels of RIA-GH and RRA-GH were found, with a normal RRA/RIA ratio. In patients with documented pituitary GH deficiency, GH-releasing factor administration resulted in an increase in GH levels that was identical in both assays. The RRA/RIA ratio remained constant throughout the test. No correlation was found between the ratio and the absolute value of either RIA-GH or RRA-GH regardless of the stimulation test used. It is concluded that the presence of an abnormal GH molecule is extremely rare in patients with short stature. Thus, the presence of a bioinactive hormone is not a common cause of growth failure. During provocative testing some changes in the ratio may occur that do not appear after GH-releasing factor, further illustrating the different mechanisms involved in GH secretion.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1990 by The Endocrine Society