help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 68, No. 1 150-159
doi:10.1210/jcem-68-1-150
Copyright © 1989 by the Endocrine Society.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PAK, C. Y. C.
Right arrow Articles by JOHNSON, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by PAK, C. Y. C.
Right arrow Articles by JOHNSON, K.

Safe and Effective Treatment of Osteoporosis With Intermittent Slow Release Sodium Fluoride: Augmentation of Vertebral Bone Mass and Inhibition of Fractures*

CHARLES Y. C. PAK, KHASHAYAR SAKHAEE, JOSEPH E. ZERWEKH, CAROL PARCEL, ROY PETERSON and KENNETH JOHNSON

Center for Mineral Metabolism and Clinical Research and Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas, Texas 75235

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Charles Y. C. Pak, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hires Boulevard, Dallas, Texas 75235.

The value of intermittent slow release sodium fluoride treatment in the management of osteoporosis was studied by a comprehensive metabolic and clinical assessment during a long term trial. Its effect was compared with that of a large dose of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25-(OH)2D] given for a short period preceding each fluoride treatment period in another group of randomly selected patients. The 24 patients in group I (3 idiopathic and 21 postmenopausal) received cyclic treatment in repeated 5-month cycles; each cycle was initiated by 1,25- (OH)2D (2 µg/day) for 2 weeks, followed for 3 months by sodium fluoride (slow release, 25 mg twice daily) with 25-hydroxyvitamin D (50 µg twice weekly) and calcium supplements (to bring total calcium intake to 1500 mg/day), and was concluded by 6 weeks of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and calcium supplementation without sodium fluoride. The 21 patients in group II (3 idiopathic and 18 postmenopausal) received the same treatment, except for the omission of 1,25-(OH)2D.

In both groups, the serum fluoride level was maintained within 5–10 µmol/L (95–190 ng/mL) during fluoride treatment, and serum osteocalcin concentrations correlated positively with the duration of treatment. However, vertebral bone mineralcontent (L2–L4) did not increase significantly in group I, whereas it rose significantly in group II (fractional change, +0.031/2.4 yr in group I vs. +0.118/2.9 yr in group II; P < 0.005). Although bone histomorphometric analyses disclosed overall improvement in both groups, only group II had significantincreases in the mineral apposition rate [0.5 ± 0.2 (±SE) to 1.4 ± 0.2 µm/day; P < 0.05] and the adjusted apposition rate (0.2 ± 0.1 to 0.7 ± 0.1 µm/day; P = 0.04). The vertebral fracture rate significantly declined in both groups, but more so in group II. Excluding the first year of treatment, the fracture rate during treatment in group II of 0.03/patient yr was significantly lower than that of 0.28/patient yr in group I (P < 0.05). The treatment was well tolerated in both groups; only 16% of patients had either gastrointestinal or rheumatic complications.

We conclude that intermittent sodium fluoride treatment without 1,25-(OH)2D provides safe and effective treatment of osteoporosis, marked by formation of new adequately mineralized bone, a rise in vertebral bone mass, and reduced frequency of vertebral fractures. The addition of 1,25-(OH)2D treatment before initiation of each fluoride phase yielded a less favorable response (J Clin Endocrirwl Metab 68: 150,1989)

* This work was supported by USPHS Grant R01-AR16061 and GCRC Grant M01-RR00633.

Received June 27, 1988.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
M. Sowers, G. M. Whitford, M. K. Clark, and M. L. Jannausch
Elevated Serum Fluoride Concentrations in Women Are Not Related to Fractures and Bone Mineral Density
J. Nutr., September 1, 2005; 135(9): 2247 - 2252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. J. Rosen and J. P. Bilezikian
Anabolic Therapy for Osteoporosis
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2001; 86(3): 957 - 964.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
P. B. Duell and C. H. Chesnut III
Exacerbation of Rheumatoid Arthritis by Sodium Fluoride Treatment of Osteoporosis
Arch Intern Med, April 1, 1991; 151(4): 783 - 784.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1989 by The Endocrine Society