help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sassolas, G.
Right arrow Articles by Loras, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sassolas, G.
Right arrow Articles by Loras, B.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 67, 180-185, Copyright © 1988 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists are unsuccessful in reducing tumoral gonadotropin secretion in two patients with gonadotropin- secreting pituitary adenomas

G Sassolas, H Lejeune, J Trouillas, MG Forest, B Claustrat, N Lahlou and B Loras
Centre de Medecine Nucleaire, Hopital Louis Pradel, Lyon, France.

Whether GnRH agonist treatment leads to reduced gonadotropin secretion and tumor volume in patients with gonadotropin-secreting pituitary adenomas is controversial. We studied the effect of GnRH analog treatment in two such patients, one with a recurrent FSH- and LH- secreting pituitary adenoma (patient 1) and one with a recurrent FSH- and alpha-subunit-secreting pituitary adenoma (patient 2). Patient 1 was treated with 200 micrograms Buserelin daily for 65 days, and patient 2 received three injections of 3 mg [D-Trp6]-LHRH formulated in microcapsules at 21-day intervals. In both patients, plasma FSH, LH (RIA), and alpha-subunit concentrations increased initially and remained above the pretreatment values throughout the treatment period. Plasma LH, measured by immunoradiometric assay, remained well above the detection limit. Plasma bioactive LH and testosterone became undetectable in patient 2, but did not change in patient 1. In neither patient did pituitary tumor size (determined by computed tomographic scan) change during treatment. We conclude that 1) the overall effect of GnRH analogs in patients with gonadotroph cell adenomas is stimulation of gonadotropin release by the tumor, although LH release varies according to how plasma LH is measured, possibly related to the origin of the hormone (normal or tumor gonadotroph cells), and 2) GnRH analog treatment does not reduce tumor size.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1988 by The Endocrine Society