help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 66, No. 3 508-517
doi:10.1210/jcem-66-3-508
Copyright © 1988 by the Endocrine Society.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GARZO, V. G.
Right arrow Articles by YEN, S. S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GARZO, V. G.
Right arrow Articles by YEN, S. S. C.

Effects of an Antiprogesterone (RU486) on the Hypothalamic-Hypophyseal-Ovarian-Endometrial Axis During the Luteal Phase of the Menstrual Cycle*

V. G. GARZO{dagger}, J. LIU{ddagger}, A. ULMANN§, E. BAULIEU| and S. S. C. YEN**

Department of Reproductive Medicine, School of Medicine (T-002), and the General Clinical Research Center, University of California-San Diego La Jolla, California 92093

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Samuel Yen, Department of Reproductive Medicine, School of Medicine (T-002), University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093.

The impact of the antiprogesterone RU486 [17β hydroxy-11β-(4-dimethylaminophenyl)17{alpha}-(1-propynyl)estra-4,9-dien-3-one] on the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian-endometrial axis was examined in normal cycling women during the mid (MLP)- and late (LLP) luteal phases. During the MLP, 10 women received 3 mg/kg RU486 for 3 days. During the LLP, a single dose of 600 mg RU486 was administered to 4 women, and in another 4 women a single dose of 3 mg/kg was given during corpus luteum rescue by hCG. Longitudinal studies with daily and frequent blood samples (every 10 min for 10 h) were conducted during 3 consecutive cycles (control-treatment-recovery).

During the MLP, RU486-induced uterine bleeding occurred in all 10 women 36–72 h after the first dose. No histological evidence of endometrial breakdown was found in endometrial biopsies taken 12–24 h before the onset of bleeding. Significant decreases in LH secretion (P < 0.001) and LH pulse amplitude (P < 0.006) and blunted pituitary responses to GnRH (P < 0.01) were evident by the last treatment day, but LH pulse frequency did not change. Complete luteolysis occurred in 2 of the 10 women. Incomplete luteolysis occurred in 8 women and was associated with an initial decline of serum estradiol (P < 0.001), but not progesterone levels, followed by rebound increases (P < 0.001) in LH, estradiol, and progesterone levels 3 days later, which may have reversed the luteolytic processes and prolonged corpus luteum function. Spontaneous luteolysis ensued 3-5 days later with the onset of second episodes of uterine bleeding. For serum FSH, an early rise occurred during the luteal phase in advance of the onset of the second episodes of uterine bleeding. This rise may have resulted in early follicle recruitment and accounted for the shorter duration of the follicular phase during recovery cycles.

During the LLP, the single RU486 dose resulted in significant decreases in LH pulse amplitude (P < 0.03), frequency (P < 0.05), and secretion (not significant) within 12 h. The recovery cycle was entirely normal. Corpus luteum rescue with incremental doses of hCG did not prevent uterine bleeding after RU486 treatment. These findings indicate that RU486 operates at multiple sites and implies that progesterone is important in the control of luteal function. Further, our data provide a basis for exploring the potential use of RU486 as a once a month birth control agent. (J Clin Endocrinol Metab 66: 508, 1988)

* This work was supported by a grant from Roussel-UCLAF and NICHHD Center Grant HD-12303 and in part by the UCSD General Clinical Research Center, NIH, Division of Research Resources (Grant RR-00827). This work was conducted in part by the Clayton Foundation for Research, California Division. Presented in part at the 12th World Congress on Fertility and Sterility, Singapore, October 1986.

{dagger} Fellow of the Medical Research Council of Canada.

{ddagger} Clinical Associate Physician, CRC.

§ Present address: Roussel-UCLAF, Paris, France.

| Present address: Laboratoire Hormones, Université de Paris, Paris, France.

** Clayton Foundation Investigator.

Received August 11, 1987.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
R.D. Catalano, H.O. Critchley, O. Heikinheimo, D.T. Baird, D. Hapangama, J.R.A. Sherwin, D.S. Charnock-Jones, S.K. Smith, and A.M. Sharkey
Mifepristone induced progesterone withdrawal reveals novel regulatory pathways in human endometrium
Mol. Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2007; 13(9): 641 - 654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
K. Gemzell-Danielsson and L. Marions
Mechanisms of action of mifepristone and levonorgestrel when used for emergency contraception
Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2004; 10(4): 341 - 348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. D. Passaro, J. Piquion, N. Mullen, D. Sutherland, S. Zhai, W. D. Figg, R. Blye, and L. K. Nieman
Luteal phase dose-response relationships of the antiprogestin CDB-2914 in normally cycling women
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2003; 18(9): 1820 - 1827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
O.D. Slayden, K. Chwalisz, and R.M. Brenner
Reversible suppression of menstruation with progesterone antagonists in rhesus macaques
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2001; 16(8): 1562 - 1574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. A. VandeVoort, J. W. Overstreet, B. L. Lasley, and D. R. Stewart
Effects of Progesterone Receptor Blockers on Human Granulosa-Luteal Cell Culture Secretion of Progesterone, Estradiol, and Relaxin
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2000; 62(1): 200 - 205.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
E. Xiao, L. Xia-Zhang, D. Shanen, and M. Ferin
Tonic Support of Luteinizing Hormone Secretion by Adrenal Progesterone in the Ovariectomized Monkey Replaced with Midfollicular Phase Levels of Estradiol
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 1997; 82(7): 2233 - 2238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
I Kokorine, E Marbaix, P Henriet, Y Okada, J Donnez, Y Eeckhout, and P. Courtoy
Focal cellular origin and regulation of interstitial collagenase (matrix metalloproteinase-1) are related to menstrual breakdown in the human endometrium
J. Cell Sci., January 8, 1996; 109(8): 2151 - 2160.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
I. M. Spitz and C.W. Bardin
Mifepristone (RU 486) -- A Modulator of Progestin and Glucocorticoid Action
N. Engl. J. Med., August 5, 1993; 329(6): 404 - 412.
[Full Text]


Home page
Arch Fam MedHome page
B. D. Weiss
RU 486: The Progesterone Antagonist
Arch Fam Med, January 1, 1993; 2(1): 63 - 69.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
E.-E. Baulieu
RU-486 as an Antiprogesterone Steroid: From Receptor to Contragestion and Beyond
JAMA, October 6, 1989; 262(13): 1808 - 1814.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
E. Baulieu
Contragestion and other clinical applications of RU 486, an antiprogesterone at the receptor
Science, September 22, 1989; 245(4924): 1351 - 1357.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1988 by The Endocrine Society