help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bryer-Ash, M.
Right arrow Articles by Luetscher, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bryer-Ash, M.
Right arrow Articles by Luetscher, J. A.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 66, 454-458, Copyright © 1988 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Plasma renin and prorenin (inactive renin) in diabetes mellitus: effects of intravenous furosemide

M Bryer-Ash, EB Fraze and JA Luetscher
Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, California 94305.

PRA, active renin, and prorenin were measured in 32 normotensive diabetic patients and 14 normal subjects of similar ages before and after iv injection of 40 mg furosemide. The majority of the diabetic patients had normal PRA and active renin levels before and after furosemide, but in 4 normal subjects and 5 diabetic patients PRA did not rise after furosemide treatment to at least 0.25 ng angiotensin I/(L.s) as previously found in 90% of normal subjects. Two thirds of the diabetic patients had higher plasma prorenin levels than the normal subjects. Four of the 5 diabetic patients whose PRA failed to rise to the usual level after furosemide treatment attained a plasma prorenin level higher than any normal subject, suggesting that furosemide stimulated synthesis and secretion of prorenin, but that conversion of prorenin to active renin was impaired. These 5 diabetic patients also had higher plasma creatinine and potassium levels as well as an increased frequency of albuminuria compared with the other diabetic patients. In contrast, the 4 normal subjects whose PRA failed to reach the usual level after furosemide treatment had low unresponsive prorenin levels, indicating that furosemide did not evoke the expected increase in prorenin or renin synthesis. We conclude that the inability of some diabetic patients to increase PRA after furosemide treatment is not dependent on failure of renin synthesis, but reflects an impairment of the normal processing of prorenin, leading to high levels of prorenin in plasma.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1988 by The Endocrine Society