help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kessel, B.
Right arrow Articles by Yen, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kessel, B.
Right arrow Articles by Yen, S. S.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 66, 361-366, Copyright © 1988 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

The dependency of bioactive follicle-stimulating hormone secretion on gonadotropin-releasing hormone in hypogonadal and cycling women

B Kessel, KD Dahl, RR Kazer, CH Liu, J Rivier, W Vale, AJ Hsueh and SS Yen
Department of Reproductive Medicine, University of California-San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla 92093.

An antagonist analog of GnRH, (Ac-delta 3-Pro1,p-F-D-Phe2,D-Trp3,6)GnRH (4F-antagonist), was administered to normal women and women with hypergonadotropic hypogonadism. Serum FSH levels were determined by both the granulosa cell aromatase bioassay and RIA. The constant infusion of 4F-antagonist (30 micrograms/kg.h) to the four hypogonadal women resulted in a more pronounced decline in bioactive FSH (62%) than in immunoreactive FSH levels (30%), and the FSH bioactive to immunoreactive ratio decreased significantly (P less than 0.05). Infusion of 4F-antagonist in normal women in the midfollicular phase revealed a similar pattern of suppression of bioactive (64%) and immunoreactive FSH (29%). When 4F-antagonist was administered sc at a dose of 80 micrograms/kg twice daily for 3 days to normal women in the midfollicular phase of their cycles, the bioactive FSH response was biphasic, with the maximal decrease on the second day, followed by return to basal levels on the third day. Correspondingly, there was a precipitous decline in serum estradiol (apparent demise of the dominant follicle), followed by a progressive rise in estradiol levels. Thus, in contrast to immunoreactive FSH levels, bioactive FSH more clearly reflects the biological action of FSH on the follicle in response to GnRH antagonist administration in women. The disparity in the quantitative decline between serum bioactive and immunoreactive FSH levels after presumed blockade of the GnRH receptor may reflect the microheterogeneity of the FSH molecule and suggests that alterations in the biological activity of secreted FSH may be GnRH dependent.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1988 by The Endocrine Society