help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM ENDO 08
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kurtz, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kitabchi, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kurtz, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kitabchi, A. E.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 64, 1261-1267, Copyright © 1987 by Endocrine Society

ARTICLES

Maintenance of normal circulating levels of delta 4-androstenedione and dehydroepiandrosterone in simple obesity despite increased metabolic clearance rates: evidence for a servo-control mechanism

BR Kurtz, JR Givens, S Komindr, MD Stevens, JG Karas, JB Bittle, D Judge and AE Kitabchi

To study the effect of obesity on the metabolism of adrenal androgens not bound to testosterone-estradiol-binding globulin, the MCRs of delta 4-androstenedione (A) and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) were determined using constant infusion of unlabeled steroids to steady state in 8 normal weight and 19 obese nonhirsute eumenorrheic women. The blood production rates (PR) were calculated as the product of the MCR and the 24-h integrated serum concentrations (IC). The mean MCR and PR of A and DHEA were significantly higher in the obese women than in the normal weight women. There was, however, no difference in the mean IC of each androgen in the 2 groups. The MCR and PR of A and DHEA were each correlated with the body mass index (BMI; kilograms per m2). The MCR and PR of A and the MCR of DHEA were also correlated with the ratio of waist circumference to hip circumference (WHR). However, the PR of DHEA was not correlated with WHR. There was no correlation between the IC of either androgen and BMI or WHR. However, partial correlation analysis revealed that correction of the BMI for WHR resulted in a significant negative correlation between BMI and IC of A. We conclude that the MCR and PR of A and DHEA were increased in obese nonhirsute eumenorrheic women; there was a strong correlation between BMI and the MCR and PR of A and DHEA; upper segment obesity, as measured by WHR, was correlated with the MCR and PR of A and the MCR of DHEA, but not with the PR of DHEA; and circulating DHEA and A were maintained at normal levels in the obese eumenorrheic women despite an increase in the MCR, which suggests that a servo-mechanism is operative which registers the body size and adjusts the PR according to the MCR.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
D. Cibula, M. Hill, M. Fanta, G. Sindelka, and J. Zivny
Does obesity diminish the positive effect of oral contraceptive treatment on hyperandrogenism in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome?
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2001; 16(5): 940 - 944.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1987 by The Endocrine Society