help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simon, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Buster, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Simon, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Buster, J. E.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 64, 789-793, Copyright © 1987 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Variability of midcycle estradiol positive feedback: evidence for unique pituitary responses in individual women

JA Simon, M Bustillo, IH Thorneycroft, SW Cohen and JE Buster

In women the preovulatory estradiol (E2) level must reach a peak concentration and dose (strength and duration) to initiate the LH surge. The variability of the surge-initiating serum E2 level in individual women from cycle to cycle, however, has not been studied. Accordingly, we studied 24 normally ovulating women longitudinally during a total of 221 menstrual cycles (range, 4-17 cycles/woman). In those women we measured periovulatory serum E2 and LH concentrations daily from 3 days before the LH peak to the day after the LH peak. The mean peak E2 concentration was 343 pg/mL, and the mean E2 dose (concentration X time) was 979 pg/mL. When the values in individual women were compared between women by components of variance analysis of variance, the differences were significant (concentration, P less than 0.01; dose, P less than 0.005), indicating that individual women have discrete and characteristic responses to E2 positive feedback. When E2 peaks and doses from initial cycles were compared with subsequent cycles by regression analysis, there were strong positive correlations (peak: r = 0.47; P less than 0.001; dose: r = 0.60; P less than 0.001). Of the total group variance in mean E2 peak and mean dose, 67% of the peak and 54% of the dose variance resulted from an individual woman's cycle to cycle variability, while 33% of the peak and 46% of the dose variance was attributable to differences among the women's responses to positive feedback. We conclude that individual women have characteristic and predictable periovulatory E2 production, leading to a LH surge which is maintained from cycle to cycle; and approximately two thirds of the total variance in mean peak E2 concentration (67%) and approximately half the variance in mean dose (54%) are the result of cycle to cycle biological variability around this characteristic periovulatory pattern of E2 production.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1987 by The Endocrine Society