| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 64, 675-680, Copyright © 1987 by Endocrine Society
ARTICLES |
KM Gross, AM Matsumoto and WJ Bremner
To test the hypothesis that the frequency of pulsatile LHRH stimulation can differentially control LH and FSH secretion in man, we administered low doses of LHRH in pulsatile fashion in several different regimens to men with idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (IHH) and presumed endogenous LHRH deficiency. In study 1, four men with IHH received a constant amount of LHRH per day in three different frequencies. After an initial 7-day period of LHRH (5.0 micrograms every 2 h), the men received 2.5 micrograms every 1 h and 7.5 micrograms every 3 h, each for 4 days, in varying order. Frequent blood samples were obtained before LHRH administration and at the end of each regimen. Before LHRH administration, mean serum FSH and LH levels were low [28 +/- 3 (+/- SEM) and 6 +/- 2 ng/mL, respectively], and they increased into the normal adult male range during LHRH treatment. As the frequency of LHRH administration decreased from every 1 to 2 to 3 h, serum FSH levels progressively increased from 99 +/- 33 to 133 +/- 34 to 181 +/- 58 ng/mL (P less than 0.05). Serum LH levels (34 +/- 6, 33 +/- 6, and 34 +/- 5 ng/mL) were significantly higher than those before LHRH administration and did not differ significantly among the three regimens. Total serum testosterone (T), estradiol, and free T levels were increased by LHRH, but were not significantly different during the three regions of LHRH administration. In study 2, three men with IHH received the same amount of LHRH per dose, given in two different pulse frequencies; 2.5 micrograms LHRH were administered in frequencies of every 0.5 h and every 1.5 h, each for 4 days, in varying order. During the 0.5 h frequency, the mean serum FSH level was 42 +/- 13 ng/mL, and it rose to 80 +/- 19 ng/mL during the 1.5 h frequency (P less than 0.05). Corresponding mean serum LH levels were 25 +/- 5 and 27 +/- 4 ng/mL. Serum T and estradiol levels were not significantly different during the two LHRH regimens. We conclude that the frequency of LHRH stimulation can differentially control FSH and LH secretion by the human pituitary gland, and the pattern of hormonal stimulation may be a determinant of target organ response.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. R. McCartney, S. K. Blank, and J. C. Marshall Progesterone acutely increases LH pulse amplitude but does not acutely influence nocturnal LH pulse frequency slowing during the late follicular phase in women Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, March 1, 2007; 292(3): E900 - E906. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.K. Blank, C.R. McCartney, and J.C. Marshall The origins and sequelae of abnormal neuroendocrine function in polycystic ovary syndrome Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2006; 12(4): 351 - 361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Hall, J. P. Sullivan, and G. S. Richardson Brief Wake Episodes Modulate Sleep-Inhibited Luteinizing Hormone Secretion in the Early Follicular Phase J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2005; 90(4): 2050 - 2055. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. De Leo, A. la Marca, and F. Petraglia Insulin-Lowering Agents in the Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2003; 24(5): 633 - 667. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Plant and G. R. Marshall The Functional Significance of FSH in Spermatogenesis and the Control of Its Secretion in Male Primates Endocr. Rev., December 1, 2001; 22(6): 764 - 786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Pastor, M. L. Griffin-Korf, J. A. Aloi, W. S. Evans, and J. C. Marshall Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Evidence for Reduced Sensitivity of the Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Pulse Generator to Inhibition by Estradiol and Progesterone J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 1998; 83(2): 582 - 590. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. L. Daniels and S. L. Berga Resistance of Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Drive to Sex Steroid-Induced Suppression in Hyperandrogenic Anovulation J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 1997; 82(12): 4179 - 4183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. K. Welt, K. A. Martin, A. E. Taylor, G. M. Lambert-Messerlian, W. F. Crowley Jr., J. A. Smith, D. A. Schoenfeld, and J. E. Hall Frequency Modulation of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) during the Luteal-Follicular Transition: Evidence for FSH Control of Inhibin B in Normal Women J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 1997; 82(8): 2645 - 2652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Veldhuis, A. Iranmanesh, E. Samojlik, and R. J. Urban Differential Sex Steroid Negative Feedback Regulation of Pulsatile Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Secretion in Healthy Older Men: Deconvolution Analysis and Steady- State Sex-Steroid Hormone Infusions in Frequently Sampled Healthy Older Individuals J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 1997; 82(4): 1248 - 1254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Padmanabhan, K. McFadden, D. T. Mauger, F. J. Karsch, and A. R. Midgley Jr. Neuroendocrine Control of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Secretion. I. Direct Evidence for Separate Episodic and Basal Components of FSH Secretion Endocrinology, January 1, 1997; 138(1): 424 - 432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Dahl, T. Bicsak, and A. Hsueh Naturally occurring antihormones: secretion of FSH antagonists by women treated with a GnRH analog Science, January 1, 1988; 239(4835): 72 - 74. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |