help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hanew, K.
Right arrow Articles by Yoshinaga, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hanew, K.
Right arrow Articles by Yoshinaga, K.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 64, 255-260, Copyright © 1987 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Growth hormone inhibitory and stimulatory actions of L-dopa in patients with acromegaly

K Hanew, A Sasaki, S Sato, M Goh and K Yoshinaga

It is not clear whether dopamine (DA) has a central stimulating activity on GH secretion in patients with acromegaly, as it does in normal subjects. To clarify this, we compared the GH inhibitory potencies of DA, which does not cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB), and L-dopa or bromocriptine, which do cross the BBB, in 23 patients with acromegaly. Further, we examined the central effects of L-dopa after selectively blocking peripheral (median eminence and pituitary) DA receptors with domperidone (a DA D2 receptor blocker which does not cross the BBB). After the administration of DA (5 micrograms/kg X min, iv, for 90 min), L-dopa (500 mg, orally), or bromocriptine (2.5 mg, orally), the mean plasma GH decrease was greatest after DA [maximum decrement, 71.9 +/- 3.8% (+/- SEM); n = 21] compared to L-dopa (44.1 +/- 5.6%; n = 23; p less than 0.001) or bromocriptine (58.9 +/- 5.0%; n = 20; p less than 0.02). Eleven of these patients received a single infusion of domperidone (0.22 mg/min, iv, for 180 min) or a combination of domperidone and L-dopa. Mean plasma GH levels did not change during domperidone alone. However, plasma GH levels in these patients increased significantly when L-dopa was administered 30 min after the start of domperidone infusion (vs. control study: at 90 min, 137.3 +/- 10.8% vs. 100.2 +/- 3.9%, p less than 0.01; at 120 min, 138.8 +/- 19.7% vs. 106.5 +/- 3.1%, p less than 0.05). In contrast, one patient who had a distinct plasma GH increase in response to the domperidone-L-dopa test had no increase in plasma GH when given L-dopa 30 min after the start of a sulpiride infusion (DA D2 receptor blocker which crosses the BBB; 1.1 mg/min, iv, for 180 min). Unlike GH, plasma PRL responses to domperidone infusion were not modified by the additional administration of L-dopa. These results suggest that in acromegaly, DA has not only direct suppressive effects on the pituitary tumor somatotrophs, but also indirect stimulatory effects via the hypothalamus; therefore, the hypothalamic GH-releasing system is not entirely suppressed by excessive tumor GH secretion.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1987 by The Endocrine Society