help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosenfield, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Burstein, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosenfield, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Burstein, S.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 63, 1386-1389, Copyright © 1986 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

The rapid ovarian secretory response to pituitary stimulation by the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist nafarelin in sexual precocity

RL Rosenfield, LR Garibaldi, GW Moll Jr, AC Watson and S Burstein

We evaluated a GnRH agonist (GnRHa) as a potential single stimulus to both pituitary and ovarian secretion in 13 girls with true precocious puberty. We compared the GnRH agonist [6-D-(2-naphthyl)alanine]GnRH acetate (nafarelin, Syntex) administered as a single sc injection of 0.2 microgram/kg to GnRH infused iv in a dose of 2 micrograms/kg X h for 3 h and assessed the response of plasma steroid intermediates in estradiol (E2) biosynthesis. Although serum LH and FSH levels increased to similar peaks 3 h after commencing GnRH and nafarelin testing, they rose faster (P less than 0.01 at 1 h) and remained elevated longer (P less than 0.05 at 24 h) after nafarelin administration. At the third hour of testing with either agent, LH and FSH rose 8.8- and 3.4-fold, respectively (P less than 0.001 vs. baseline), whereas the rise in E2 was inconsistent and averaged only one third (P less than 0.02). However, plasma E2 increased later after nafarelin, but not after GnRH, rising from a baseline level of 30 +/- 6 (+/- SEM) to 115 +/- 13 pg/ml at 24 h (P less than 0.001). The least E2 response to nafarelin at this time was 150%. This rise is probably an underestimate of the maximum E2 rise, since a 6-fold response to nafarelin was found at 12 h in patients sampled then. Measurement of steroid intermediates from progesterone and 17 alpha-hydroxypregnenolone to E2 indicated that the response to nafarelin was typical of normal ovarian follicular secretion. That is, plasma levels of the intermediates in E2 biosynthesis rose less than 2-fold, and only the elevations in androstenedione, from 58 +/- 10 to 78 +/- 16 ng/dl (P less than 0.05), and estrone, from 14 +/- 3 to 38 +/- 7 pg/ml (P less than 0.02), at 24 h were significant. The greater effectiveness of nafarelin than GnRH in stimulating E2 secretion appears to be related to the more prolonged gonadotropin response. The magnitude, consistency, specificity, and rapidity of the gonadotropin and E2 responses to nafarelin indicate that this is a promising agent for rapidly testing pituitary and ovarian function simultaneously.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1986 by The Endocrine Society