help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Desir, D.
Right arrow Articles by Copinschi, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Desir, D.
Right arrow Articles by Copinschi, G.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 63, 1292-1299, Copyright © 1986 by Endocrine Society

ARTICLES

Prolonged pulsatile administration of ovine corticotropin-releasing hormone in normal man

D Desir, E Van Cauter, M Beyloos, D Bosson, J Golstein and G Copinschi

The 24-h profiles of plasma ACTH and cortisol were determined at 15-min intervals in five normal men basally and during iv bolus injections of 25 micrograms ovine corticotropin-releasing hormone (oCRH) every 4 h for 72 h. Each oCRH injection was followed by a distinct elevation of plasma ACTH and cortisol levels, with a return to basal values before the next injection. The characteristics of the ACTH and cortisol pulses induced by 25 micrograms oCRH (i.e. 0.3-0.4 micrograms/kg) were similar to those observed in other studies with 1 microgram/kg human CRH. There was no significant blunting of oCRH-induced hormonal increments in the course of the 72-h study. On each oCRH injection day, the mean 24-h cortisol level was higher than that in the basal study, but there was no increase in the mean 24-h ACTH level. During the 72-h oCRH study, the preinjection ACTH and cortisol levels exhibited a diurnal variation, indicating persistence of the circadian periodicity of pituitary-adrenal activity. There was a diurnal variation of oCRH- induced ACTH increments, with highest responses at 0700 h. A small but not significant reverse trend was apparent for cortisol increments. Spontaneous pulses of ACTH and cortisol occurred throughout the 3 days of oCRH injections, and the total number of spontaneous and oCRH- induced pulses was similar to the number of spontaneous pulses observed in the basal study. All oCRH-induced and more than 90% of spontaneous cortisol pulses occurred concomitantly with an ACTH pulse. The variability of pulse increments was greater for ACTH than for cortisol. In conclusion, prolonged pulsatile administration of oCRH did not induce pituitary desensitization and did not suppress the endogenous circadian and pulsatile ACTH and cortisol variations.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1986 by The Endocrine Society