help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bercu, B. B.
Right arrow Articles by Shulman, D. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bercu, B. B.
Right arrow Articles by Shulman, D. I.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 63, 968-973, Copyright © 1986 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Preservation of dopaminergic and alpha-adrenergic function in children with growth hormone neurosecretory dysfunction

BB Bercu, AW Root and DI Shulman

The integrity of dopaminergic and alpha-adrenergic neurotransmitter regulation of GH secretion was examined in children with decreased GH secretion. Children with GH neurosecretory dysfunction (GHND; n = 16) those with classical GH deficiency (n = 9), and short but otherwise normal children (n = 12) underwent 24 h GH studies (blood sampling every 20 min for 24 h) and provocative tests using arginine, insulin hypoglycemia, L-dopa (dopaminergic) and clonidine (alpha-adrenergic), and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH). GHND was defined as children with height in the first percentile or below, growth velocity of 4 cm/yr or less, low plasma somatomedin-C for age, delayed skeletal age by 2 or more yr, peak serum GH responses to any one (or more) provocative test of 10 ng/ml or more, and mean 24-h GH concentration below 3 ng/ml. GHND and GH-deficient children had reduced endogenous GH secretion, expressed as mean serum 24-h GH concentration [1.6 +/- 0.1 (+/- SEM) and 2.1 +/- 0.1 vs. 6.1 +/- 0.5 ng/ml (GH-deficient and GHND vs. normal, respectively); P less than 0.01]. the mean peak serum GH levels after arginine [8.2 +/- 2.0 vs. 20.8 +/- 6.6 ng/ml (GHND vs. normal); P less than 0.05] and insulin [9.3 +/- 1.0 vs. 16.2 +/- 1.7 ng/ml (GHND vs. normal); P less than 0.01) were lower in GHND children. The mean peak responses after L-dopa [13.4 +/- 3.4 vs. 14.6 +/- 4.7 ng/ml (GHND vs. normal); P = NS] and clonidine [19.0 +/- 2.2 vs. 23.3 +/- 3.8 ng/ml (GHND vs. normal); P = NS] were preserved in GHND children. In GH- deficient children, mean peak serum GH concentrations after all four provocative tests were low (arginine, 2.7 +/- 0.8; insulin, 2.6 +/- 0.8; L-dopa, 3.0 +/- 0.9; clonidine, 3.4 +/- 1.0 ng/ml; all P less than 0.01 vs. normal). The mean peak serum GH concentration after GHRH was blunted in GH-deficient children (9.1 +/- 1.7 ng/ml) compared to those in GHND (32.9 +/- 8.5 ng/ml) and normal (43.2 +/- 6.4 ng/ml) children (P less than 0.01). The area under the GH curve after GHRH stimulation was greater for normal than GHND children (P less than 0.05). These data demonstrate preservation of dopaminergic and alpha-adrenergic neurotransmitter pathways in GHND children. They further suggest a defect in the release of pituitary GH secondary to an abnormality in alternative neurotransmitter pathways resulting in decreased GHRH and/or increased somatostatin secretion.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1986 by The Endocrine Society