help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fujimoto, M.
Right arrow Articles by Migeon, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fujimoto, M.
Right arrow Articles by Migeon, C. J.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 63, 468-474, Copyright © 1986 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Time-dependent biphasic response of aromatase to dexamethasone in cultured human skin fibroblasts

M Fujimoto, GD Berkovitz, TR Brown and CJ Migeon

Human genital skin fibroblasts grown in cell culture possess aromatase activity and, therefore, provide a model to investigate the molecular mechanisms that control aromatase in extraglandular tissues. Following the observation by other investigators that glucocorticoids stimulated aromatase activity in cultured stromal-vascular cells from adipose tissue, we examined the influence of dexamethasone (DEX) on aromatase in cultured skin fibroblasts. Preincubation of skin fibroblasts with DEX stimulated aromatase expression in all cell strains. In time-course studies, aromatase activity showed a biphasic curve, with peak levels at 12 h and a return to baseline levels by 72 h. When DEX was removed after 12 h, aromatase activity could be completely restimulated by DEX only after a period of 60-72 h. The DEX stimulation appeared to involve glucocorticoid receptor function, since the concentration of DEX required for half-maximal stimulation of aromatase activity (4.2 nM) was similar to the dissociation constant (Kd, 4.3 nM) of the receptor (for DEX). Actinomycin D and cycloheximide (CHX) inhibited DEX stimulation of aromatase when they were present in the preincubation and assay media. When cells were preincubated with DEX and CHX and then washed free of CHX and DEX before the assay, superinduction of aromatase activity occurred. Our data concerning the time course and superinduction of aromatase activity by DEX are in contrast to the findings reported by others for adipose tissue stromal-vascular cells and suggest that the mechanisms for the control of aromatase in extraglandular tissue may vary significantly in different tissues.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1986 by The Endocrine Society