| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Division of Endocrinology, Lutheran Medical Center
Departments of Anesthesiology and Pharmacology
Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine Cleveland, Ohio 44113;
Endocrine Sciences Tarzana, California 91356
Address requests for reprints to: Harris C. Taylor, M.D., 2609 Franklin Boulevard, Cleveland, Ohio 44113.
Baseline plasma norepinephrine (NE) and epinephrine (E) levels over 2000 pg/ml or failure to suppress to less than 500 pg/ml after oral clonidine have been considered diagnostic of the presence of a pheochromocytoma. We found a false negative clonidine suppression test in a patient with an asymptomatic ACTH-secreting pheochromocytoma who had minimally increased resting plasma NE and E values of 669 and 419 pg/ml, respectively. Clonidine suppression caused decreases at 2 and 3 h to 372 and 408 pg/ml, respectively. A positive test was found in a patient with repeatedly elevated baseline plasma NE and E concentrations; the two highest results were 2501 and 3022 pg/ml. Clonidine administration on five occasions failed to decrease plasma NE and E levels to less than 500 pg/ml. However, no pheochromocytoma was found by selective venous catheterization, two laparotomies, and, ultimately, postmortem examination. Diffuse infiltration of lymphoplasmacytic cells throughout sympathetic ganglia and adrenal medulla raise the possibility of a diffuse autoimmune disorder, resulting in excessive catecholamine production. These examples suggest that the clonidine suppression test does not always indicate the presence or absence of a pheochromocytoma.
* Presented at the 67th Annual Meeting of The Endocrine Society, June 20,1985, Baltimore, MD.
Received June 24, 1985.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. L. Brain, J. Kay, and B. Shine Measurement of Urinary Metanephrines to Screen for Pheochromocytoma in an Unselected Hospital Referral Population Clin. Chem., November 1, 2006; 52(11): 2060 - 2064. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Eisenhofer, D. S. Goldstein, M. M. Walther, P. Friberg, J. W. M. Lenders, H. R. Keiser, and K. Pacak Biochemical Diagnosis of Pheochromocytoma: How to Distinguish True- from False-Positive Test Results J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2003; 88(6): 2656 - 2666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Pacak, W. M. Linehan, G. Eisenhofer, M. M. Walther, and D. S. Goldstein Recent Advances in Genetics, Diagnosis, Localization, and Treatment of Pheochromocytoma Ann Intern Med, February 20, 2001; 134(4): 315 - 329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Sjoberg, K. J. Simcic, and G. S. Kidd The Clonidine Suppression Test for Pheochromocytoma: A Review of Its Utility and Pitfalls Arch Intern Med, June 1, 1992; 152(6): 1193 - 1197. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. J. Elliott, M. B. Murphy, F. H. Straus II, and J. Jarabak Improved Safety of Glucagon Testing for Pheochromocytoma by Prior {alpha}-Receptor Blockade: A Controlled Trial in a Patient With a Mixed Ganglioneuroma/Pheochromocytoma Arch Intern Med, January 1, 1989; 149(1): 214 - 216. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |