help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chalew, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kowarski, A. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chalew, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kowarski, A. A.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 62, 1110-1115, Copyright © 1986 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing hormone in children with subnormal integrated concentrations of GH

SA Chalew, KM Armour, PA Levin, MO Thorner and AA Kowarski

We determined the GH responses to human GH-releasing hormone-40 (GHRH) in poorly growing children who had either normal or deficient GH secretion, as measured by pharmacological stimulation and integrated concentration of GH (IC-GH). Ten patients had both normal pharmacologically stimulated GH and IC-GH (GH-normal), 15 patients had normal pharmacologically stimulated GH but deficient IC-GH [GH neurosecretory dysfunction (GHND)], and the remaining 7 patients had both subnormal stimulated GH and IC-GH [GH deficiency (GHD)]. The mean peak plasma GH response to GHRH was 11.7 +/- 8.5 (+/- SD) ng/ml in GHD patients, significantly lower than the responses of both the GHND (49.2 +/- 39.2 ng/ml; P less than 0.0001) and GH-normal (51.8 +/- 44 ng/ml; P less than 0.0001) groups. The range of peak GH responses to GHRH in GHD patients overlapped the lower end of the range of responses in the GHND and GH-normal patients. Three GH-normal and eight GHND patients had greatly enhanced GH responses to GHRH (greater than 50 ng/ml); no GHD patients had a response over 24.2 ng/ml. There was no difference between the GH responses of male and female patients within groups to GHRH. There was a significant correlation between the log of the peak GH response to GHRH and the log of the maximal GH response to standard pharmacological stimuli (r = 0.51; P less than 0.005). Because of the variability of GH responses to GHRH encountered among the patients, the response to GHRH cannot be used as a test for identifying patients with inadequate spontaneous GH secretion. The IC-GH is the only method that can identify children with GHND.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
Somatostatin Infusion Withdrawal: Studies in Normal Children and in Children with Growth Hormone Deficiency
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 1999; 84(12): 4426 - 4430.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1986 by The Endocrine Society