help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mais, V.
Right arrow Articles by Yen, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mais, V.
Right arrow Articles by Yen, S. S.

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol 62, 1089-1092, Copyright © 1986 by Endocrine Society


ARTICLES

Prolactin-releasing action of gonadotropin-releasing hormone in hypogonadal women

V Mais and SS Yen

To gain insight into the PRL-releasing effect of GnRH, serum PRL and gonadotropin responses to a 10-microgram iv bolus dose of exogenous GnRH were studied in hypergonadotropic hypogonadal women (HHW) and patients with functional hypothalamic amenorrhea (FHA). The results were compared with those obtained in normal cycling women during the early follicular phase of the cycle. GnRH induced a significant increase in PRL levels (P less than 0.001) in HHW compared to early follicular phase women, in whom no significant response occurred. In HHW, the maximal PRL percent increment was positively correlated with the ratio of the maximal percent increments of FSH and LH (r = 0.93). GnRH induced a significant increase in PRL levels in every FHA patient, but in four of them (high PRL responders), the PRL response was at least 5-fold greater than in the other six (low PRL responders). The clinical profiles, basal hormone concentrations, and LH responses to GnRH were similar in these two groups of FHA patients, but the FSH response to GnRH was greater (P less than 0.05) in the high PRL responders. The maximal percent increment of PRL was also positively correlated with the maximal percent increment of FSH (r = 0.76; P = 0.01). These data demonstrate that in these two hypogonadal models, the PRL response to exogenous GnRH corresponds to the FSH response and suggests that GnRH-stimulated PRL release may be mediated by a paracrine effect between FSH-enriched gonadotrophs and lactotrophs.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 1986 by The Endocrine Society